Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 170 of 5,944 reporting institutions (90th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 259 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $230.5B | 33.6× | 20.6× | 6.8× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| BHPLF | $220.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| SCCO | $162.8B | 37.6× | 21.0× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.3% | 39.3% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| TX | $107.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $99.7B | — | 12.0× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 7.9% | 1.0× | 1,775 |
| SHW | $91.6B | 36.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| AEM | $82.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| ECL | $80.5B | 39.2× | 23.7× | 5.0× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $68.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| CRH | $66.9B | 18.1× | 10.4× | 1.8× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| APD | $65.7B | — | 92.9× | 5.5× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $63.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| SYAXF | $63.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DD | $61.5B | — | — | 9.0× | 1.9% | 34.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 1,172 |
| WPM | $55.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| AU | $44.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| STLD | $38.5B | 33.3× | 20.7× | 2.1× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| VMC | $37.5B | 35.4× | 17.6× | 4.7× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $33.4B | 29.5× | 18.6× | 5.4× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| TCKRF | $32.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 |
| NTR | $32.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| AMRZ | $29.2B | 24.7× | 12.1× | 2.5× | 0.9% | 25.7% | 10.0% | 8.9% | 6.5% | 1.9× | 433 |
| GFIOF | $28.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| PPG | $26.6B | 17.2× | — | 1.7× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.8% | — | 1,003 |
| TGLS | $2.1B | 14.0× | 8.4× | 2.2× | 10.5% | 42.8% | 16.2% | 22.4% | 18.0% | 0.7× | 170 |
Peers = companies sharing TGLS's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $47.75 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 15.5%/yr for a decade (off $62M normalized FCF).
The market's 15.5% is more conservative than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt $71M
mean 1007.1% · volatility σ 2822% · implied rate exceeded in 3/7 yrs
Central path = implied 15.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (2822%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $983.6M 100.0% | $890.2M 100.0% | $833.3M 100.0% | $716.6M 100.0% | $496.8M 100.0% | $376.6M 100.0% | $430.9M 100.0% | $371.0M 100.0% | $314.5M 100.0% | $305.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $562.2M 57.2% | $510.2M 57.3% | $442.3M 53.1% | $367.1M 51.2% | $294.2M 59.2% | $237.2M 63.0% | $295.1M 68.5% | $250.8M 67.6% | $215.3M 68.5% | $192.4M 63.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $215.3M 68.5% | $192.4M 63.1% |
| Gross Profit | $421.4M 42.8% | $380.0M 42.7% | $390.9M 46.9% | $349.5M 48.8% | $202.6M 40.8% | $139.4M 37.0% | $135.8M 31.5% | $120.2M 32.4% | $99.2M 31.5% | $112.6M 36.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $90.9M 9.2% | $71.7M 8.1% | $63.1M 7.6% | $54.1M 7.5% | $35.8M 7.2% | $34.7M 9.2% | $35.1M 8.1% | $33.6M 9.1% | $31.0M 9.9% | $27.8M 9.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $196.3M 20.0% | $153.0M 17.2% | $131.2M 15.7% | $123.1M 17.2% | $85.6M 17.2% | $73.7M 19.6% | $77.0M 17.9% | $73.0M 19.7% | $64.8M 20.6% | $64.8M 21.2% |
| Operating Income | $230.7M 23.5% | $227.0M 25.5% | $259.8M 31.2% | $226.4M 31.6% | $117.0M 23.5% | $65.7M 17.4% | $58.8M 13.6% | $47.2M 12.7% | $34.4M 10.9% | $47.8M 15.7% |
| Interest Expense | $6.0M 0.6% | $6.2M 0.7% | $7.9M 1.0% | $6.8M 0.9% | $8.5M 1.7% | $20.7M 5.5% | $22.8M 5.3% | $21.2M 5.7% | $19.9M 6.3% | $16.8M 5.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $3.1M 0.3% | $5.9M 0.7% | $5.1M 0.6% | $4.2M 0.6% | $608K 0.1% | $100K 0.0% | $1.6M 0.4% | $2.9M 0.8% | $3.2M 1.0% | $4.2M 1.4% |
| Pretax Income | $235.3M 23.9% | $225.2M 25.3% | $261.4M 31.4% | $231.2M 32.3% | $96.9M 19.5% | $36.9M 9.8% | $37.2M 8.6% | $14.5M 3.9% | $11.5M 3.7% | $39.3M 12.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $75.7M 7.7% | $63.8M 7.2% | $77.9M 9.3% | $74.8M 10.4% | $28.5M 5.7% | $13.0M 3.5% | $12.9M 3.0% | $6.0M 1.6% | $5.8M 1.8% | $16.1M 5.3% |
| Net Income | $159.6M 16.2% | $161.3M 18.1% | $182.9M 21.9% | $155.7M 21.7% | $68.2M 13.7% | $23.9M 6.3% | $24.5M 5.7% | $9.0M 2.4% | $5.4M 1.7% | $23.2M 7.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.42 | $3.43 | $3.85 | $3.27 | $1.43 | $0.51 | $0.55 | $0.22 | $0.16 | $0.71 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.42 | $3.43 | $3.85 | $3.27 | $1.43 | $0.51 | $0.55 | $0.21 | $0.15 | $0.69 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 46.7M | 47.0M | 47.5M | 47.7M | 47.7M | 46.4M | 44.5M | 39.1M | 36.8M | 32.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 46.7M | 47.0M | 47.5M | 47.7M | 47.7M | 46.4M | 44.5M | 39.5M | 37.4M | 33.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend takes 82% of free cash flow — sustainable but with limited headroom. Last year: $28M dividends + $0 buybacks = $28M returned on $34M FCF.
5 consecutive years of dividend increases · 45%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 18%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $101M covers the $3M due within a year 30.8× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-09-30 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~3.5% on $172M of debt.
Cash of $101M fully covers short-term debt of $427000.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 54th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 67.6 | 68.5 | 63.0 | 59.2 | 51.2 | 53.1 | 57.3 | 57.2 |
| Gross Profit | 32.4 | 31.5 | 37.0 | 40.8 | 48.8 | 46.9 | 42.7 | 42.8 |
| SG&A | 9.1 | 8.1 | 9.2 | 7.2 | 7.5 | 7.6 | 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Operating Income | 12.7 | 13.6 | 17.4 | 23.5 | 31.6 | 31.2 | 25.5 | 23.5 |
| Income Tax | 1.6 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 5.7 | 10.4 | 9.3 | 7.2 | 7.7 |
| Net Income | 2.4 | 5.7 | 6.3 | 13.7 | 21.7 | 21.9 | 18.1 | 16.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TGLS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.