Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -94.94% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.71B 100.0% | $3.10B 100.0% | $2.91B 100.0% | $3.28B 100.0% | $2.99B 100.0% | $2.94B 100.0% | $2.30B 100.0% | $2.21B 100.0% | $1.90B 100.0% | $2.00B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.73B 63.8% | $1.76B 56.6% | $1.72B 59.0% | $1.69B 51.6% | $1.60B 53.5% | $1.50B 51.2% | $1.23B 53.4% | $1.07B 48.3% | $933.7M 49.1% | $795.5M 39.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $379.7M 14.0% | $394.6M 12.7% | $412.0M 14.2% | $414.5M 12.6% | $396.4M 13.3% | $365.6M 12.4% | $326.8M 14.2% | $315.3M 14.3% | $287.4M 15.1% | $331.0M 16.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $2.27B 83.7% | $2.32B 74.7% | $2.18B 74.8% | $2.29B 69.8% | $2.19B 73.2% | $2.07B 70.4% | $1.74B 75.7% | $1.51B 68.4% | $1.36B 71.3% | $1.30B 64.7% |
| Operating Income | $443.0M 16.3% | $784.8M 25.3% | $733.5M 25.2% | $990.6M 30.2% | $802.2M 26.8% | $871.0M 29.6% | $559.0M 24.3% | $698.5M 31.6% | $545.9M 28.7% | $708.2M 35.3% |
| Interest Expense | $158.4M 5.8% | $169.2M 5.5% | $172.9M 5.9% | $174.0M 5.3% | $185.7M 6.2% | $210.3M 7.2% | $205.5M 8.9% | $192.1M 8.7% | $210.3M 11.0% | $232.0M 11.6% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $25.5M 0.9% | $27.0M 0.9% | $29.3M 1.0% | $6.9M 0.2% | $2K 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$154.2M -5.7% | -$11.8M -0.4% | -$127.0M -4.4% | -$157.1M -4.8% | -$188.5M -6.3% | -$233.9M -8.0% | -$183.4M -8.0% | -$189.8M -8.6% | -$235.2M -12.4% | -$258.9M -12.9% |
| Pretax Income | — | — | — | — | $613.7M 20.5% | $637.1M 21.7% | $375.7M 16.3% | $508.7M 23.0% | $310.7M 16.3% | $449.3M 22.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $69.3M 2.6% | $173.9M 5.6% | $130.2M 4.5% | $202.4M 6.2% | $135.5M 4.5% | $154.3M 5.3% | $89.4M 3.9% | $107.4M 4.9% | -$137.2M -7.2% | $140.2M 7.0% |
| Net Income | $219.9M 8.1% | $599.8M 19.3% | $476.7M 16.4% | $630.5M 19.2% | $477.0M 15.9% | $482.8M 16.4% | $286.2M 12.4% | $405.7M 18.4% | $273.7M 14.4% | $436.7M 21.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.36 | $3.55 | $2.29 | $2.82 | $2.15 | $2.20 | $1.32 | $1.88 | $1.27 | $2.02 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.34 | $3.53 | $2.28 | $2.81 | $2.14 | $2.19 | $1.31 | $1.87 | $1.26 | $1.99 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 161.4M | 168.4M | 207.6M | 223.7M | 221.5M | 219.2M | 217.1M | 216.2M | 215.6M | 216.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 162.8M | 169.2M | 207.9M | 224.5M | 222.5M | 219.7M | 218.0M | 216.6M | 217.5M | 219.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81 · book equity (no price)
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 28% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $80M dividends + $0 buybacks = $80M returned on $283M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $291M covers the $0 due within a year 291240000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~6.3% on $2.5B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Loading top holders...
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 48.3 | 53.4 | 51.2 | 53.5 | 51.6 | 59.0 | 56.6 | 63.8 |
| SG&A | 14.3 | 14.2 | 12.4 | 13.3 | 12.6 | 14.2 | 12.7 | 14.0 |
| Operating Income | 31.6 | 24.3 | 29.6 | 26.8 | 30.2 | 25.2 | 25.3 | 16.3 |
| Income Tax | 4.9 | 3.9 | 5.3 | 4.5 | 6.2 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 2.6 |
| Net Income | 18.4 | 12.4 | 16.4 | 15.9 | 19.2 | 16.4 | 19.3 | 8.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TGNA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TGNA | — | — | — | — | -12.6% | 36.2% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 3.9% | 5.0× | 5 |
Peers = companies sharing TGNA's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 5 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.