Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 397 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| THO | $4.2B | 16.4× | — | 0.4× | -4.6% | 14.0% | 2.7% | 6.0% | 5.0% | — | 397 |
Peers = companies sharing THO's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $587M covers the $3M due within a year 174.2× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-07-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~6.7% on $920M of debt.
Cash of $587M fully covers short-term debt of $3M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.58B 100.0% | $10.04B 100.0% | $11.12B 100.0% | $16.31B 100.0% | $12.32B 100.0% | $8.17B 100.0% | $7.86B 100.0% | $8.33B 100.0% | $7.25B 100.0% | $4.58B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $8.24B 86.0% | $8.59B 85.5% | $9.53B 85.6% | $13.51B 82.8% | $10.42B 84.6% | $7.05B 86.3% | $6.89B 87.6% | $7.16B 86.0% | $6.20B 85.6% | $3.86B 84.1% |
| Gross Profit | $1.34B 14.0% | $1.45B 14.5% | $1.60B 14.4% | $2.81B 17.2% | $1.89B 15.4% | $1.12B 13.7% | $973.1M 12.4% | $1.16B 14.0% | $1.04B 14.4% | $726.3M 15.9% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | — | — | $9.4M 0.1% | $2.0M 0.0% | $2.6M 0.0% | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $922.6M 9.6% | $895.5M 8.9% | $870.1M 7.8% | $1.12B 6.8% | $869.9M 7.1% | $634.1M 7.8% | $536.0M 6.8% | $477.4M 5.7% | $419.8M 5.8% | $306.3M 6.7% |
| Interest Expense | $61.2M 0.6% | $100.0M 1.0% | $97.4M 0.9% | $90.1M 0.6% | $93.5M 0.8% | $107.3M 1.3% | $68.1M 0.9% | $5.2M 0.1% | $9.7M 0.1% | $1.6M 0.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | $1.1M 0.0% | $797K 0.0% | $3.1M 0.0% | $8.1M 0.1% | $2.1M 0.0% | $923K 0.0% | $743K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $45.6M 0.5% | $13.6M 0.1% | $11.3M 0.1% | $17.3M 0.1% | $30.3M 0.2% | $305K 0.0% | -$1.8M -0.0% | $4.0M 0.0% | $5.4M 0.1% | $1.2M 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $296.2M 3.1% | $348.8M 3.5% | $499.4M 4.5% | $1.46B 8.9% | $844.6M 6.9% | $272.9M 3.3% | $184.7M 2.3% | $633.0M 7.6% | $556.4M 7.7% | $383.3M 8.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $39.6M 0.4% | $83.4M 0.8% | $125.1M 1.1% | $321.6M 2.0% | $183.7M 1.5% | $51.5M 0.6% | $52.2M 0.7% | $202.9M 2.4% | $182.1M 2.5% | $125.3M 2.7% |
| Net Income | $258.6M 2.7% | $265.3M 2.6% | $374.3M 3.4% | $1.14B 7.0% | $659.9M 5.4% | $223.0M 2.7% | $133.3M 1.7% | $430.2M 5.2% | $374.3M 5.2% | $256.5M 5.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $4.87 | $4.98 | $7.00 | $20.67 | $11.93 | $4.04 | $2.47 | $8.17 | $7.12 | $4.89 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $4.84 | $4.94 | $6.95 | $20.59 | $11.85 | $4.02 | $2.47 | $8.14 | $7.09 | $4.88 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 53.1M | 53.2M | 53.5M | 55.0M | 55.3M | 55.2M | 53.9M | 52.7M | 52.6M | 52.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 53.4M | 53.7M | 53.9M | 55.3M | 55.7M | 55.4M | 54.0M | 52.9M | 52.8M | 52.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $79.48 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -8.0%/yr for a decade (off $697M normalized FCF).
The market's -8.0% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares · net debt $333M
mean 13.3% · volatility σ 38% · implied rate exceeded in 8/9 yrs
Central path = implied -8.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (38%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $53M buybacks = $53M returned on $574M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 86.0 | 87.6 | 86.3 | 84.6 | 82.8 | 85.6 | 85.5 | 86.0 |
| Gross Profit | 14.0 | 12.4 | 13.7 | 15.4 | 17.2 | 14.4 | 14.5 | 14.0 |
| R&D | 0.0 | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 5.7 | 6.8 | 7.8 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 7.8 | 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Income Tax | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Net Income | 5.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 5.4 | 7.0 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 2.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on THO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.