Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 313 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 633 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $33.13T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $405.3B | 46.3× | 32.2× | 6.0× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $399.8B | 46.8× | — | 8.7× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $298.4B | 44.8× | 21.3× | 3.4× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| ABBNY | $187.8B | 50.7× | 33.5× | 5.8× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $175.3B | 24.7× | 16.7× | 7.2× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $173.5B | 42.8× | — | 6.3× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| DE | $165.5B | 33.1× | — | 3.6× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| HON | $157.6B | 33.7× | 18.9× | 4.2× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| HTHIF | $153.6B | 0.7× | — | 0.0× | 3.9% | 25.2% | 2.6% | 16.6% | 7.4% | — | 2 |
| LMT | $132.3B | 26.9× | 17.0× | 1.8× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 18.4% | 2.4× | 2,807 |
| PH | $127.9B | 36.8× | 28.7× | 6.4× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| HWM | $117.0B | 78.5× | 51.2× | 14.2× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 18.4% | 1.2× | 1,399 |
| ADP | $109.5B | 27.1× | — | 5.3× | 7.1% | 46.0% | 19.8% | 65.9% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| TT | $107.8B | 37.3× | 26.5× | 5.1× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| VRT | $106.3B | 81.5× | 50.3× | 10.4× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.5% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| GD | $103.9B | 24.9× | 18.1× | 2.0× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| PWR | $102.2B | 100.4× | 50.3× | 3.6× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.7% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 0.0× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $100.1B | 30.6× | — | 4.2× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| MMM | $96.6B | 30.4× | 18.4× | 3.9× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| CSX | $95.1B | 33.2× | 15.3× | 6.8× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| EMR | $91.4B | 40.2× | — | 5.1× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| UPS | $91.4B | 16.4× | 10.1× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| WM | $90.4B | 33.5× | 12.7× | 3.6× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| CMI | $89.7B | 31.7× | 16.9× | 2.7× | -1.3% | 25.3% | 8.8% | 23.9% | 23.9% | — | 1,877 |
| TRN | $2.6B | 10.6× | 8.2× | 1.2× | -30.0% | 26.6% | 12.9% | 25.7% | 4.3% | 5.7× | 313 |
Peers = companies sharing TRN's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $201M is below the $1.1B due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2020 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $32.46 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 8.8%/yr for a decade (off $363M normalized FCF).
The market's 8.8% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.08B shares · net debt $5.2B
mean -6.2% · volatility σ 70% · implied rate exceeded in 2/8 yrs
Central path = implied 8.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (70%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 31% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $99M dividends + $71M buybacks = $170M returned on $314M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 12%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.16B 100.0% | $3.08B 100.0% | $2.98B 100.0% | $1.98B 100.0% | $1.52B 100.0% | $1.75B 100.0% | $2.75B 100.0% | $2.51B 100.0% | $2.40B 100.0% | $3.09B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.58B 73.4% | $2.41B 78.3% | $2.46B 82.3% | $1.61B 81.4% | $1.16B 76.6% | $1.33B 75.9% | $2.18B 79.1% | $1.94B 77.3% | $1.78B 74.0% | $2.31B 74.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $214.3M 9.9% | $235.7M 7.7% | $201.9M 6.8% | $185.4M 9.4% | $179.6M 11.8% | $189.6M 10.8% | $217.0M 7.9% | $296.6M 11.8% | $339.3M 14.2% | $313.9M 10.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.59B 94.1% | $2.19B 87.4% | $2.03B 84.6% | $2.61B 84.5% |
| Operating Income | $649.2M 30.1% | $491.5M 16.0% | $417.0M 14.0% | $334.0M 16.9% | $256.8M 16.9% | -$154.6M -8.8% | $396.8M 14.4% | $315.1M 12.6% | $368.3M 15.4% | $478.9M 15.5% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | $219.2M 12.5% | $221.8M 8.1% | $179.3M 7.1% | $184.0M 7.7% | $181.9M 5.9% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | $3.2M 0.2% | $7.3M 0.3% | $11.9M 0.5% | $10.4M 0.4% | $5.3M 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$273.8M -12.7% | -$269.7M -8.8% | -$268.0M -9.0% | -$207.5M -10.5% | -$201.6M -13.3% | -$370.0M -21.1% | -$215.6M -7.8% | -$163.5M -6.5% | -$172.9M -7.2% | -$168.9M -5.5% |
| Pretax Income | $375.4M 17.4% | $221.8M 7.2% | $149.0M 5.0% | $126.5M 6.4% | $55.2M 3.6% | -$524.6M -30.0% | $181.2M 6.6% | $151.6M 6.0% | $195.4M 8.2% | $310.0M 10.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $90.9M 4.2% | $50.4M 1.6% | $9.0M 0.3% | $27.6M 1.4% | $15.9M 1.0% | -$274.1M -15.7% | $58.8M 2.1% | $42.6M 1.7% | -$414.8M -17.3% | $106.8M 3.5% |
| Net Income | $277.3M 12.9% | $157.1M 5.1% | $126.6M 4.2% | $72.9M 3.7% | $181.8M 12.0% | -$147.3M -8.4% | $137.6M 5.0% | $159.3M 6.3% | $702.5M 29.3% | $343.6M 11.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.13 | $1.69 | $1.31 | $0.73 | $1.79 | $-1.27 | $1.09 | $1.09 | $4.62 | $2.25 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.05 | $1.64 | $1.27 | $0.71 | $1.75 | $-1.27 | $1.07 | $1.07 | $4.52 | $2.25 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 80.8M | 81.9M | 81.2M | 81.9M | 101.5M | 115.9M | 125.6M | 144.0M | 148.6M | 148.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 82.9M | 84.2M | 83.4M | 84.2M | 103.8M | 115.9M | 127.3M | 146.4M | 152.0M | 148.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 72th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 77.3 | 79.1 | 75.9 | 76.6 | 81.4 | 82.3 | 78.3 | 73.4 |
| SG&A | 11.8 | 7.9 | 10.8 | 11.8 | 9.4 | 6.8 | 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Operating Income | 12.6 | 14.4 | -8.8 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 14.0 | 16.0 | 30.1 |
| Income Tax | 1.7 | 2.1 | -15.7 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 4.2 |
| Net Income | 6.3 | 5.0 | -8.4 | 12.0 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 12.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TRN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.