Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.02% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 3 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| TRPCF | $29.3B | — | 11.9× | 3.3× | -83.3% | 80.6% | 53.4% | 19.5% | 16.5% | 1.9× | 3 |
Peers = companies sharing TRPCF's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $45.16 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -28.8%/yr for a decade (off $14.1B normalized FCF).
The market's -28.8% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.65B shares · net debt -$1.3B
mean 85.7% · volatility σ 335% · implied rate exceeded in 6/8 yrs
Central path = implied -28.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (335%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 10% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $204M dividends + $629M buybacks = $833M returned on $1.9B FCF.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 17%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~2.8% on $4.4B of debt.
Cash of $5.7B fully covers short-term debt of $2.8B.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04 · 16d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.93B 100.0% | $53.29B 100.0% | $44.51B 100.0% | $20.04B 100.0% | $20.02B 100.0% | $18.32B 100.0% | $35.67B 100.0% | $30.96B 100.0% | $26.80B 100.0% | $19.80B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.73B 19.4% | $9.99B 18.7% | $8.12B 18.2% | $4.51B 22.5% | $4.60B 23.0% | $4.03B 22.0% | $7.37B 20.7% | $6.32B 20.4% | $4.68B 17.5% | $4.73B 23.9% |
| Gross Profit | $7.19B 80.6% | $43.30B 81.3% | $36.39B 81.8% | $15.53B 77.5% | $15.43B 77.0% | $14.29B 78.0% | $28.29B 79.3% | $24.64B 79.6% | $22.12B 82.5% | $14.52B 73.3% |
| Research & Development | $2.16B 24.2% | $13.14B 24.7% | $12.12B 27.2% | $8.34B 41.6% | $8.99B 44.9% | $7.67B 41.9% | $10.67B 29.9% | $9.62B 31.1% | $8.26B 30.8% | $7.69B 38.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $640.0M 7.2% | $4.09B 7.7% | $3.74B 8.4% | $2.85B 14.2% | $2.92B 14.6% | $3.64B 19.9% | $3.29B 9.2% | $2.82B 9.1% | $2.62B 9.8% | $2.52B 12.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $4.93B 55.3% | $29.13B 54.7% | $25.07B 56.3% | $15.44B 77.0% | $16.84B 84.1% | $15.71B 85.8% | $23.25B 65.2% | $22.04B 71.2% | $19.18B 71.6% | $16.07B 81.1% |
| Operating Income | $2.26B 25.3% | $14.18B 26.6% | $11.32B 25.4% | $88.0M 0.4% | -$1.41B -7.0% | -$1.42B -7.8% | $5.04B 14.1% | $2.60B 8.4% | $2.94B 11.0% | -$1.55B -7.8% |
| Interest Expense | $121.0M 1.4% | $1.74B 3.3% | $2.07B 4.6% | $1.51B 7.6% | $1.56B 7.8% | $1.72B 9.4% | $1.68B 4.7% | $1.51B 4.9% | $1.29B 4.8% | $732.0M 3.7% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $372.0M 4.2% | $2.34B 4.4% | $2.09B 4.7% | $2.05B 10.2% | $2.13B 10.6% | $2.19B 11.9% | $2.09B 5.9% | $1.90B 6.1% | $988.0M 3.7% | $567.0M 2.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $3.05B 34.2% | $2.22B 4.2% | -$667.0M -1.5% | $2.02B 10.1% | $373.0M 1.9% | -$273.0M -1.5% | $3.63B 10.2% | -$1.07B -3.5% | $879.0M 3.3% | -$27.0M -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $5.56B 62.3% | $17.00B 31.9% | $10.68B 24.0% | $2.63B 13.1% | -$471.0M -2.4% | -$1.23B -6.7% | $9.09B 25.5% | $1.92B 6.2% | $3.52B 13.2% | -$1.74B -8.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $832.0M 9.3% | $2.60B 4.9% | $1.75B 3.9% | $682.0M 3.4% | $270.0M 1.3% | $355.0M 1.9% | $1.74B 4.9% | $793.0M 2.6% | $1.28B 4.8% | $482.0M 2.4% |
| Net Income | $4.76B 53.4% | $17.07B 32.0% | $9.92B 22.3% | $1.40B 7.0% | -$550.0M -2.7% | -$3.25B -17.7% | $7.01B 19.7% | $1.11B 3.6% | $2.15B 8.0% | -$1.42B -7.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 657.8M | 654.0M | 652.9M | 648.4M | 634.1M | 600.9M | 567.9M | 68.4M | 66.3M | 59.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 698.4M | 688.7M | 671.1M | 657.1M | 634.1M | 600.9M | 642.0M | 70.9M | 71.8M | 59.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range · 70th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 20.4 | 20.7 | 22.0 | 23.0 | 22.5 | 18.2 | 18.7 | 19.4 |
| Gross Profit | 79.6 | 79.3 | 78.0 | 77.0 | 77.5 | 81.8 | 81.3 | 80.6 |
| R&D | 31.1 | 29.9 | 41.9 | 44.9 | 41.6 | 27.2 | 24.7 | 24.2 |
| SG&A | 9.1 | 9.2 | 19.9 | 14.6 | 14.2 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 7.2 |
| Operating Income | 8.4 | 14.1 | -7.8 | -7.0 | 0.4 | 25.4 | 26.6 | 25.3 |
| Income Tax | 2.6 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 4.9 | 9.3 |
| Net Income | 3.6 | 19.7 | -17.7 | -2.7 | 7.0 | 22.3 | 32.0 | 53.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TRPCF: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.