Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 856 of 5,944 reporting institutions (98th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| TSN | $20.8B | 43.8× | 8.4× | 0.4× | 2.1% | 6.5% | 0.9% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 0.4× | 856 |
Peers = companies sharing TSN's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 2%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.2B covers the $909M due within a year 1.4× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-09-27 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~49.4% on $909M of debt.
Cash of $1.2B fully covers short-term debt of $909M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $54.44B 100.0% | $53.31B 100.0% | $52.88B 100.0% | $53.28B 100.0% | $47.05B 100.0% | $43.19B 100.0% | $42.41B 100.0% | $40.05B 100.0% | $38.26B 100.0% | $36.88B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $50.88B 93.5% | $49.68B 93.2% | $50.25B 95.0% | $46.61B 87.5% | $40.52B 86.1% | $37.80B 87.5% | $37.38B 88.2% | $34.96B 87.3% | $33.20B 86.8% | $32.18B 87.3% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $33.18B 86.7% | $32.18B 87.3% |
| Gross Profit | $3.56B 6.5% | $3.63B 6.8% | $2.63B 5.0% | $6.67B 12.5% | $6.53B 13.9% | $5.38B 12.5% | $5.02B 11.8% | $5.10B 12.7% | $5.06B 13.2% | $4.70B 12.7% |
| Research & Development | $126.0M 0.2% | $106.0M 0.2% | $114.0M 0.2% | $108.0M 0.2% | $114.0M 0.2% | $98.0M 0.2% | $97.0M 0.2% | $114.0M 0.3% | $113.0M 0.3% | $96.0M 0.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $2.12B 3.9% | $2.22B 4.2% | $2.25B 4.2% | $2.26B 4.2% | $2.13B 4.5% | $2.38B 5.5% | $2.25B 5.3% | $2.13B 5.3% | $2.14B 5.6% | $1.86B 5.1% |
| Operating Income | $1.10B 2.0% | $1.41B 2.6% | -$395.0M -0.7% | $4.41B 8.3% | $4.40B 9.3% | $3.01B 7.0% | $2.77B 6.5% | $2.97B 7.4% | $2.92B 7.6% | $2.83B 7.7% |
| Interest Expense | $449.0M 0.8% | $481.0M 0.9% | $355.0M 0.7% | $365.0M 0.7% | $428.0M 0.9% | $485.0M 1.1% | $462.0M 1.1% | $350.0M 0.9% | $279.0M 0.7% | $249.0M 0.7% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $73.0M 0.1% | $89.0M 0.2% | $30.0M 0.1% | $17.0M 0.0% | $8.0M 0.0% | $10.0M 0.0% | $11.0M 0.0% | $7.0M 0.0% | $7.0M 0.0% | $6.0M 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$329.0M -0.6% | -$317.0M -0.6% | -$283.0M -0.5% | -$261.0M -0.5% | -$355.0M -0.8% | -$344.0M -0.8% | -$396.0M -0.9% | -$287.0M -0.7% | -$293.0M -0.8% | -$235.0M -0.6% |
| Pretax Income | $769.0M 1.4% | $1.09B 2.0% | -$678.0M -1.3% | $4.15B 7.8% | $4.04B 8.6% | $2.66B 6.2% | $2.37B 5.6% | $2.68B 6.7% | $2.63B 6.9% | $2.60B 7.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $262.0M 0.5% | $270.0M 0.5% | -$29.0M -0.1% | $900.0M 1.7% | $981.0M 2.1% | $593.0M 1.4% | $381.0M 0.9% | -$291.0M -0.7% | $850.0M 2.2% | $826.0M 2.2% |
| Net Income | $474.0M 0.9% | $800.0M 1.5% | -$648.0M -1.2% | $3.24B 6.1% | $3.05B 6.5% | $2.06B 4.8% | $1.98B 4.7% | $2.97B 7.4% | $1.77B 4.6% | $1.77B 4.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.33 | $2.25 | $-1.87 | $8.92 | $8.34 | $5.64 | $5.40 | $8.04 | $4.79 | $4.53 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 357.0M | 356.0M | 284.0M | 363.0M | 365.0M | 365.0M | 366.0M | 369.0M | 370.0M | 390.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $58.19 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 4.3%/yr for a decade (off $1.3B normalized FCF).
The market's 4.3% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.36B shares · net debt -$320M
mean -17.3% · volatility σ 68% · implied rate exceeded in 2/8 yrs
Central path = implied 4.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (68%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 59% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $697M dividends + $0 buybacks = $697M returned on $1.2B FCF.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases · 15%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 87.3 | 88.2 | 87.5 | 86.1 | 87.5 | 95.0 | 93.2 | 93.5 |
| Gross Profit | 12.7 | 11.8 | 12.5 | 13.9 | 12.5 | 5.0 | 6.8 | 6.5 |
| R&D | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| SG&A | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 3.9 |
| Operating Income | 7.4 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 9.3 | 8.3 | -0.7 | 2.6 | 2.0 |
| Income Tax | -0.7 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | -0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Net Income | 7.4 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 6.5 | 6.1 | -1.2 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TSN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.