Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q2 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
Average free cash flow across the last 3 positive fiscal years (FY2023, FY2024, FY2025). Smooths the cycle. Stock compensation is NOT charged — it is added back inside operating cash flow.
To be worth $0.51 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 4.8%/yr for a decade (off $22.2M on the 3-yr avg basis).
On the basis ($14.7M) the requirement is 10.4%/yr. Shares issued to employees are added back in operating cash flow, so this basis treats them as free.
The market's 4.8% is more optimistic than its 2-yr track record.
Default is 10.3% — this company's computed cost of capital (computed WACC), the same rate the Analysis tab discounts at.
2-stage DCF · 0.31B shares (market data) · net debt $188.0M
mean -10.5% · volatility σ 68% · implied rate exceeded in 1/2 yrs
Central path = implied 4.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (68%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $410K buybacks = $410K returned on $12.9M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 6 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -25%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 6 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-21
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 13th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE -82% against ROIC -25% — -57% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
Equity is the year-end figure. On average equity over the two year-ends, ROE is -59.0% — the two diverge when buybacks or issuance move equity during the year.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 35.2 | 42.1 | 59.0 | 44.9 | 49.3 | 47.7 |
| Gross Profit | 64.8 | 57.9 | 41.0 | 55.1 | 50.7 | 52.3 |
| R&D | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 46.0 | 38.7 | 46.6 | 46.0 | 33.8 | 33.1 |
| Operating Income | 15.6 | 11.8 | -135.5 | 11.9 | 14.5 | 16.1 |
| Income Tax | 8.1 | 14.9 | -4.4 | 9.3 | 9.4 | 11.3 |
| Net Income | -107.6 | 3.2 | -131.3 | -34.6 | -27.1 | -31.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TSNDF: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $37.4M (at 2025-12-31) covers the $6.6M due within a year 5.7× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-06-30 (10-Q). The cash figure is from 2025-12-31, so the two are not the same balance-sheet date — the schedule has not been refiled since.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~12.8% on $225.5M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-21
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $260.6M 100.0% | $268.1M 100.0% | $250.5M 100.0% | $247.8M 100.0% | $194.2M 100.0% | $132.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $124.2M 47.7% | $132.2M 49.3% | $112.5M 44.9% | $146.3M 59.0% | $81.7M 42.1% | $46.5M 35.2% |
| Gross Profit | $136.3M 52.3% | $135.9M 50.7% | $138.0M 55.1% | $101.5M 41.0% | $112.5M 57.9% | $85.7M 64.8% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | — | $136K 0.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $86.2M 33.1% | $90.6M 33.8% | $115.2M 46.0% | $115.6M 46.6% | $75.1M 38.7% | $60.8M 46.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $94.3M 36.2% | $96.9M 36.2% | $108.3M 43.2% | $437.4M 176.5% | $89.6M 46.1% | $65.1M 49.3% |
| Operating Income | $42.0M 16.1% | $38.9M 14.5% | $29.7M 11.9% | -$335.9M -135.5% | $22.9M 11.8% | $20.6M 15.6% |
| Interest Expense | $28.8M 11.1% | $27.5M 10.3% | $31.1M 12.4% | $26.8M 10.8% | $21.2M 10.9% | $2.0M 1.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $888K 0.3% | $851K 0.3% | -$800K -0.3% | $206K 0.1% | $230K 0.1% | -$393K -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $5.0M 1.9% | $4.2M 1.6% | -$4.2M -1.7% | -$310.2M -125.2% | $44.5M 22.9% | -$116.9M -88.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $29.5M 11.3% | $25.1M 9.4% | $23.4M 9.3% | -$10.8M -4.4% | $28.9M 14.9% | $10.8M 8.1% |
| Net Income | -$81.3M -31.2% | -$72.7M -27.1% | -$86.7M -34.6% | -$325.4M -131.3% | $6.1M 3.2% | -$142.3M -107.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||
| EPS (Basic) | -$0.29 | -$0.28 | -$0.34 | -$1.35 | $0.02 | -$1.03 |
| EPS (Diluted) | -$0.29 | -$0.28 | -$0.34 | -$1.35 | $0.01 | -$1.03 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 301.1M | 291.5M | 279.3M | 244.4M | 181.1M | 149.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 301.1M | 291.5M | 279.3M | 244.4M | 208.7M | 149.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 6 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-06-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTBIF | $1.4B | 13.7× | 5.0× | 1.2× | 3.4% | 48.9% | 9.7% | 6.0% | 5.3% | -0.1× | 5 |
| DMC | $1.3B | 14.8× | 6.9× | 0.3× | 1.0% | 9.2% | 2.1% | 4.5% | 4.1% | 0.7× | — |
| DOLE | $1.2B | 24.7× | 5.5× | 0.1× | 8.2% | 7.8% | 0.6% | 3.8% | 2.3% | 1.8× | 207 |
| VRNO | $387M | — | 41.2× | 0.5× | -6.5% | 50.3% | -31.4% | -36.6% | -23.4% | 18.6× | 1 |
| VFF | $336M | 10.2× | 6.6× | 1.6× | 10.2% | 40.6% | 15.0% | 10.8% | 9.7% | -1.1× | 102 |
| LMNR | $195M | — | — | 1.2× | -16.6% | 3.1% | -10.0% | -8.9% | -6.3% | — | 111 |
| TSNDF | $158M | — | 6.8× | 0.6× | -2.8% | 52.3% | -31.2% | -82.1% | -25.1% | 3.7× | 1 |
Peers = companies sharing TSNDF's sector (Agricultural Production-Crops) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Earns -0.97pts against its cost of capital — capital is being consumed, not created.
| Period | ROIC | Cost of capital | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2021 | 8.7% | 32.0% | -23.4pts |
| FY2022 | -42.8% | 9.5% | -52.3pts |
| FY2023 | 4.2% | 9.9% | -5.7pts |
| FY2024 | 6.9% | 10.4% | -3.5pts |
| FY2025 | 9.1% | 9.9% | -0.7pts |
| Now | -25.1% | 10.3% | -35.3pts |
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 64.8% | 15.6% | -107.6% |
| FY2021 | 57.9% | 11.8% | 3.2% |
| FY2022 | 41.0% | -135.5% | -131.3% |
| FY2023 | 55.1% | 11.9% | -34.6% |
| FY2024 | 50.7% | 14.5% | -27.1% |
| FY2025 | 52.3% | 16.1% | -31.2% |
Return on equity is 57 points BELOW the return on invested capital, which means the equity base is carrying capital the operations are not earning on — usually cash, goodwill, or a recent raise.
ROE is on average equity; ROIC is NOPAT over average invested capital (debt plus equity less excess cash). The gap is not a single adjustment.
$114M of goodwill — 36% of invested capital. The gap is what was paid above the fair value of what was bought; it is real capital shareholders provided, so neither bar is the whole answer.
ROIC ex-goodwill is 14.49% against 9.28% reported — the return is earned on a capital base inflated by what was paid for acquisitions, not by the operating business alone.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
Stressed coverage falls to 1.0x — below the level at which interest is reliably covered.
| EBITDA decline | Interest coverage |
|---|---|
| 0% | 1.46x |
| 5% | 1.38x |
| 10% | 1.31x |
| 15% | 1.24x |
| 20% | 1.17x |
| 25% | 1.09x |
| 30% | 1.02x |
| 35% | 0.95x |
| 40% | 0.87x |
| 45% | 0.80x |
| 50% | 0.73x |
| 55% | 0.66x |
| 60% | 0.58x |
Ladder as of 2026-06-30 (10-Q); cash from the 2025-12-31 balance sheet; FCF from FY2025.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Net debt is 4.3x EBITDA, so coverage today depends on earnings holding up rather than on the balance sheet.
At $0.51, free cash flow must compound 5.91%/yr for 10 years. It has no positive compounding record to compare against, though across a reporting-basis change.
| Fiscal year | FCF growth | Price requires |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 37.5% | 5.9% |
| FY2025 | −58.5% | 5.9% |
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. TTM basis: TTM.
The achieved growth rate spans a reporting-basis change in FY2023, so part of it measures the restatement rather than the business.
Last reported position per insider, carried forward. Steps can be a holding disclosed for the first time rather than a trade.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-10 | Ghanem Ziad President and CEO | Grant | 350,000 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-06-24 | 16 co-filers Group filing | Other | 200,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 4 co-filers President and CEO | Other | 325,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 6 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Other | 275,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Other | 150,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 16 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 200,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 4 co-filers President and CEO | Grant | 325,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 150,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 6 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Grant | 275,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 4 co-filers President and CEO | Other | 350,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 6 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Other | 281,250 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 16 co-filers Group filing | Other | 1,000,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 6 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Grant | 281,250 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 16 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 1,000,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 4 co-filers President and CEO | Grant | 350,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 6 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Other | 325,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | 6 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Grant | 325,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-23 | Schutter Edward J Director | Grant | 1,000 | $1000.00 | $1.0m |
| 2026-04-27 | Jackson Eric Matthew Chief Financial Officer | Grant | 300,000 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-08 | 2 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Tax withholding | 7,412 | $0.66 | $5k |
| 2026-04-08 | 2 co-filers President and CEO | Tax withholding | 22,017 | $0.66 | $15k |
| 2026-04-07 | 2 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Tax withholding | 5,591 | $0.62 | $3k |
| 2026-04-07 | 2 co-filers President and CEO | Tax withholding | 9,998 | $0.62 | $6k |
| 2026-04-04 | 2 co-filers President and CEO | Tax withholding | 105,051 | $0.68 | $71k |
| 2026-04-04 | 2 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Tax withholding | 50,879 | $0.68 | $35k |
| 2026-04-03 | 2 co-filers Chief People and Legal Officer | Grant | 540,254 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-03 | 2 co-filers President and CEO | Grant | 1,388,040 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-03-23 | Ghanem Ziad President and CEO | Tax withholding | 3,027 | $0.70 | $2k |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.