Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +12.46% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $6.36 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 4.4%/yr for a decade (off $33M normalized FCF).
The market's 4.4% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt $416M
mean 6.6% · volatility σ 78% · implied rate exceeded in 3/9 yrs
Central path = implied 4.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (78%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TSQ | $103M | — | 8.3× | 0.2× | -5.2% | 25.5% | -2.7% | 28.1% | -3.0% | 6.7× | 62 |
Peers = companies sharing TSQ's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $427.4M 100.0% | $451.0M 100.0% | $454.2M 100.0% | $463.1M 100.0% | $418.0M 100.0% | $371.3M 100.0% | $431.4M 100.0% | $407.9M 100.0% | $389.6M 100.0% | $421.6M 100.0% |
| Gross Profit | $109.1M 25.5% | $124.2M 27.5% | $125.0M 27.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $21.0M 4.9% | $23.8M 5.3% | $25.0M 5.5% | $24.4M 5.3% | $24.5M 5.9% | $26.9M 7.2% | $28.6M 6.6% | $27.1M 6.6% | $25.8M 6.6% | $25.4M 6.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $383.2M 89.7% | $429.3M 95.2% | $473.4M 104.2% | $407.5M 88.0% | $343.5M 82.2% | $446.3M 120.2% | $468.5M 108.6% | $390.1M 95.6% | $342.2M 87.8% | $347.1M 82.3% |
| Operating Income | $44.2M 10.3% | $21.7M 4.8% | -$19.1M -4.2% | $55.6M 12.0% | $74.5M 17.8% | -$75.0M -20.2% | -$37.1M -8.6% | $17.8M 4.4% | $47.4M 12.2% | $74.5M 17.7% |
| Interest Expense | $47.9M 11.2% | $36.2M 8.0% | $37.2M 8.2% | $39.8M 8.6% | $39.8M 9.5% | $31.4M 8.5% | $33.9M 7.8% | $34.3M 8.4% | $32.8M 8.4% | $34.1M 8.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$94K -0.0% | $5.0M 1.1% | $6.0M 1.3% | -$2.0M -0.4% | $500K 0.1% | $820K 0.2% | -$1.1M -0.2% | -$811K -0.2% | -$363K -0.1% | $228K 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$5.0M -1.2% | -$9.6M -2.1% | -$49.2M -10.8% | $13.8M 3.0% | $29.1M 7.0% | -$104.4M -28.1% | -$72.1M -16.7% | -$17.1M -4.2% | $14.3M 3.7% | $37.0M 8.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $4.7M 1.1% | $1.3M 0.3% | -$6.1M -1.4% | -$564K -0.1% | $10.4M 2.5% | -$23.9M -6.4% | -$14.6M -3.4% | $30.8M 7.6% | -$7.5M -1.9% | $16.1M 3.8% |
| Net Income | -$11.5M -2.7% | -$12.7M -2.8% | -$45.0M -9.9% | $12.3M 2.7% | $16.7M 4.0% | -$82.5M -22.2% | -$67.8M -15.7% | -$98.7M -24.2% | -$13.7M -3.5% | $23.0M 5.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | — | $-0.81 | $-2.68 | — | — | — | — | — | $-0.56 | $1.28 |
| EPS (Diluted) | — | $-0.81 | $-2.68 | — | — | — | — | — | $-0.56 | $0.85 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | — | 15.6M | 16.8M | 17.0M | 18.6M | 27.6M | 27.5M | 27.5M | 27.4M | 18.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 16.2M | 15.6M | 16.8M | 18.2M | 21.2M | 18.6M | 18.5M | 18.5M | 27.9M | 27.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $15M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -3%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $5M is below the $12M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~11.4% on $421M of debt.
Cash of $5M is below short-term debt of $12M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 12-yr range · 38th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 12-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | 27.5 | 27.5 | 25.5 |
| SG&A | 6.6 | 6.6 | 7.2 | 5.9 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 4.9 |
| Operating Income | 4.4 | -8.6 | -20.2 | 17.8 | 12.0 | -4.2 | 4.8 | 10.3 |
| Income Tax | 7.6 | -3.4 | -6.4 | 2.5 | -0.1 | -1.4 | 0.3 | 1.1 |
| Net Income | -24.2 | -15.7 | -22.2 | 4.0 | 2.7 | -9.9 | -2.8 | -2.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TSQ: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position