Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Ranked against 28 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCD | $182.1B | 21.5× | 17.3× | 6.8× | 3.7% | — | 31.9% | -478% | 22.0% | 3.1× | 1,221 |
| YUM | $42.2B | 27.9× | 14.9× | 5.1× | 8.8% | 69.8% | 19.0% | -21.3% | -21.4% | -0.2× | 409 |
| CMG | $39.7B | 27.4× | 17.1× | 3.3× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | -0.1× | 337 |
| QSR | $25.5B | 31.1× | 16.1× | 2.7× | 12.2% | — | 11.4% | 29.6% | 6.4% | 5.5× | 136 |
| DRI | $24.9B | 21.2× | 12.6× | 1.9× | 9.4% | 20.3% | 9.1% | 54.7% | 26.6% | 1.0× | 315 |
| YUMC | $15.2B | 18.0× | 8.5× | 1.3× | 4.4% | — | 7.9% | 17.3% | 17.2% | -0.3× | 149 |
| ARMK | $14.7B | 45.9× | 15.4× | 0.8× | 6.4% | — | 1.8% | 10.4% | 3.8% | 3.8× | 120 |
| TXRH | $12.0B | 30.0× | 17.4× | 2.0× | 9.4% | — | 7.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | -0.2× | 132 |
| EAT | $9.2B | 20.2× | 10.9× | 1.6× | 7.9% | — | 8.4% | 110% | 110% | -0.1× | 110 |
| CAVA | $6.9B | 109.7× | 51.4× | 5.9× | 22.4% | — | 5.4% | 8.2% | 8.2% | -2.2× | 98 |
| CAKE | $5.6B | 37.0× | 20.4× | 1.5× | 4.7% | — | 4.0% | 34.0% | 13.9% | 1.4× | 76 |
| WING | $3.9B | 23.4× | 24.2× | 5.6× | 11.4% | — | 25.0% | -23.7% | 36.9% | 5.0× | 73 |
| CBRL | $1.6B | 51.8× | 17.4× | 0.5× | -4.7% | 69.1% | 1.0% | 6.6% | 3.9% | 2.7× | 48 |
| ARCO | $1.5B | 6.8× | 4.2× | 0.3× | 4.7% | 98.1% | 4.5% | 27.5% | 11.1% | 1.4× | 25 |
| BJRI | $1.3B | 29.3× | 11.4× | 1.0× | 3.1% | 74.7% | 3.5% | 13.3% | 10.8% | 0.5× | 31 |
| BH | $1.2B | — | 20.5× | 3.1× | 9.2% | 59.2% | -9.5% | -7.2% | -4.9% | -0.4× | 13 |
| BLMN | $915M | 106.9× | 7.7× | 0.2× | 0.1% | 70.2% | 0.2% | 2.5% | 0.7% | 3.4× | 35 |
| FWRG | $772M | 40.4× | 11.0× | 0.6× | 20.3% | — | 1.6% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 2.8× | 32 |
| PZZA | $619M | 20.9× | 7.2× | 0.3× | -0.3% | — | 1.5% | -6.9% | 11.3% | 3.8× | 47 |
| LOCO | $468M | 17.1× | 8.8× | 0.9× | 3.6% | — | 5.4% | 9.1% | 7.7% | 0.8× | 23 |
| DIN | $445M | 31.7× | — | 0.5× | 8.2% | 40.9% | 1.9% | -6.2% | 1.9% | — | 26 |
| KRUS | $424M | — | 40.6× | 1.5× | 18.9% | — | -0.7% | -0.8% | -0.8% | -5.1× | 16 |
| NATH | $418M | 21.0× | 14.2× | 2.6× | 9.4% | 34.3% | 12.4% | -141% | 59.0% | 0.8× | 22 |
| PTLO | $360M | 18.4× | 9.4× | 0.5× | 3.0% | — | 2.6% | 4.1% | 2.4% | 4.5× | 33 |
| PLAY | $283M | — | 4.9× | 0.1× | -1.4% | 85.7% | -2.3% | -53.4% | -3.0% | 4.1× | 20 |
| TWNPQ | $5733 | — | 26.8× | — | 53.2% | — | -13.6% | 56.9% | -14.5% | — | — |
Peers = companies sharing TWNPQ's sector (Retail-Eating Places) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$40.2M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 2 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -15%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 2 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $9.4M is below the $414.0M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-09-28 (10-Q). The cash figure is from 2024-12-29, so the two are not the same balance-sheet date — the schedule has not been refiled since.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~11.1% on $415.7M of debt.
Cash of $9.4M is below short-term debt of $10.7M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow on any basis, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2024
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2024 | FY2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $353.8M 100.0% | $230.9M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $33.2M 9.4% | $19.3M 8.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $362.1M 102.4% | $217.9M 94.4% |
| Operating Income | -$8.3M -2.4% | $12.9M 5.6% |
| Interest Expense | $46.1M 13.0% | $29.7M 12.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$48.2M -13.6% | -$27.0M -11.7% |
| Pretax Income | -$56.6M -16.0% | -$14.1M -6.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$8.4M -2.4% | -$230K -0.1% |
| Net Income | -$48.2M -13.6% | -$13.8M -6.0% |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2024 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 57% against ROIC -15% — 71% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2023 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Operating Income | 5.6 | -2.4 |
| Income Tax | -0.1 | -2.4 |
| Net Income | -6.0 | -13.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TWNPQ: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Cost of capital cannot be computed, so the spread is unknown.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | not reported | 5.6% | -6.0% |
| FY2024 | not reported | -2.4% | -13.6% |
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: tax_rate.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
Stressed coverage falls to -0.1x — below the level at which interest is reliably covered.
| EBITDA decline | Interest coverage |
|---|---|
| 0% | -0.18x |
| 5% | -0.17x |
| 10% | -0.16x |
| 15% | -0.15x |
| 20% | -0.14x |
| 25% | -0.14x |
| 30% | -0.13x |
| 35% | -0.12x |
| 40% | -0.11x |
| 45% | -0.10x |
| 50% | -0.09x |
| 55% | -0.08x |
| 60% | -0.07x |
Ladder as of 2025-09-28 (10-Q); cash from the 2024-12-29 balance sheet; FCF from FY2024. Free cash flow is negative, so projected resources fall rather than accumulate.
Balance sheet at 2024-12-29. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Free cash flow is negative, so debt service depends on the cash balance rather than on the business.
No positive free cash flow to discount, so the price cannot be expressed as a growth requirement.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: free_cash_flow.