Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -0.56% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.93 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -7.3%/yr for a decade (off $72M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.07B shares · net debt $287M
mean -161.9% · volatility σ 365% · implied rate exceeded in 2/7 yrs
Central path = implied -7.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (365%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 16d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.95B 100.0% | $2.01B 100.0% | $2.02B 100.0% | $1.98B 100.0% | $2.05B 100.0% | $2.03B 100.0% | $2.22B 100.0% | $2.25B 100.0% | $2.74B 100.0% | $2.82B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.40B 71.8% | $1.42B 70.8% | $1.46B 72.6% | $1.45B 73.3% | $1.48B 72.2% | $1.54B 76.2% | $1.69B 76.0% | $1.67B 74.0% | $2.19B 80.0% | $2.20B 78.1% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.10B 76.7% | $2.09B 74.2% |
| Gross Profit | $549.3M 28.2% | $585.9M 29.2% | $551.3M 27.4% | $529.6M 26.7% | $572.0M 27.8% | $483.0M 23.8% | $534.0M 24.0% | $686.3M 30.5% | $547.7M 20.0% | $558.6M 19.8% |
| Research & Development | $24.6M 1.3% | $25.2M 1.3% | $24.1M 1.2% | $24.2M 1.2% | $28.5M 1.4% | $26.6M 1.3% | $31.3M 1.4% | $31.9M 1.4% | $38.7M 1.4% | $47.0M 1.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $391.2M 20.1% | $424.2M 21.1% | $450.3M 22.3% | $453.2M 22.9% | $389.5M 19.0% | $369.4M 18.2% | $364.8M 16.4% | $340.3M 15.1% | $411.9M 15.0% | $441.2M 15.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.87B 96.0% | $1.91B 95.2% | $1.94B 96.2% | $1.93B 97.4% | $1.90B 92.5% | $1.94B 95.7% | $2.08B 93.8% | $2.04B 90.6% | $2.64B 96.5% | $2.69B 95.4% |
| Operating Income | $78.5M 4.0% | $97.4M 4.8% | $76.9M 3.8% | $52.2M 2.6% | $154.0M 7.5% | $87.0M 4.3% | $137.9M 6.2% | $212.1M 9.4% | $97.1M 3.5% | $129.2M 4.6% |
| Interest Expense | $53.4M 2.7% | $31.9M 1.6% | $30.8M 1.5% | $32.4M 1.6% | $35.4M 1.7% | $29.2M 1.4% | $62.1M 2.8% | $64.0M 2.8% | $52.8M 1.9% | $27.4M 1.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $20.7M 1.1% | $23.2M 1.2% | $26.3M 1.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$297.3M -15.2% | -$140.8M -7.0% | -$393.9M -19.5% | -$82.4M -4.2% | -$580.3M -28.2% | -$329.6M -16.3% | -$136.4M -6.1% | -$77.1M -3.4% | -$116.4M -4.2% | -$81.3M -2.9% |
| Pretax Income | -$272.2M -14.0% | -$75.3M -3.7% | -$347.8M -17.3% | -$62.6M -3.2% | -$461.7M -22.5% | -$271.8M -13.4% | -$60.6M -2.7% | $71.0M 3.2% | -$72.1M -2.6% | $20.5M 0.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $67.8M 3.5% | $117.9M 5.9% | $79.3M 3.9% | $42.3M 2.1% | -$11.9M -0.6% | $45.4M 2.2% | $27.7M 1.2% | $46.0M 2.0% | -$5.5M -0.2% | $57.2M 2.0% |
| Net Income | -$339.8M -17.4% | -$193.4M -9.6% | -$430.7M -21.4% | -$106.0M -5.4% | -$448.5M -21.8% | $750.7M 37.0% | -$17.2M -0.8% | $75.5M 3.4% | -$65.3M -2.4% | -$47.7M -1.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-4.79 | $-2.79 | $-6.31 | $-1.57 | $-6.75 | $11.93 | $-0.31 | $1.48 | $-1.30 | $-0.95 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-4.79 | $-2.79 | $-6.31 | $-1.57 | $-6.75 | $11.93 | $-0.31 | $1.47 | $-1.30 | $-0.95 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 71.0M | 69.2M | 68.3M | 67.7M | 66.5M | 62.9M | 56.0M | 50.9M | 50.4M | 50.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 71.0M | 69.2M | 68.3M | 67.7M | 66.5M | 62.9M | 56.0M | 51.5M | 50.4M | 50.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$170M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -81%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $414M covers the $5M due within a year 76.6× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~7.6% on $701M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 41th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 6.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 74.0 | 76.0 | 76.2 | 72.2 | 73.3 | 72.6 | 70.8 | 71.8 |
| Gross Profit | 30.5 | 24.0 | 23.8 | 27.8 | 26.7 | 27.4 | 29.2 | 28.2 |
| R&D | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| SG&A | 15.1 | 16.4 | 18.2 | 19.0 | 22.9 | 22.3 | 21.1 | 20.1 |
| Operating Income | 9.4 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 7.5 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 4.0 |
| Income Tax | 2.0 | 1.2 | 2.2 | -0.6 | 2.1 | 3.9 | 5.9 | 3.5 |
| Net Income | 3.4 | -0.8 | 37.0 | -21.8 | -5.4 | -21.4 | -9.6 | -17.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on UIS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| UIS | $208M | — | 4.8× | 0.1× | -2.9% | 28.2% | -17.4% | 120% | -81.3% | 6.9× | 152 |
Peers = companies sharing UIS's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position