Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-21 | Brecher Howard A Chairman and CEO | Open-market buy | 200 | $33.89 | $7k |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.
Top 11 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 25 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BX | $89.0B | 30.6× | — | 6.2× | 9.2% | — | 20.9% | 34.8% | 14.2% | — | 721 |
| APO | $68.4B | 20.9× | — | 2.1× | 22.7% | — | 10.9% | 15.0% | 9.5% | — | — |
| AMP | $42.7B | 13.5× | — | 2.3× | 5.5% | — | 18.8% | 54.4% | 54.4% | — | 444 |
| TROW | $22.7B | 11.5× | — | 3.1× | 3.1% | — | 28.5% | 19.2% | 19.2% | — | 372 |
| BEN | $16.1B | 34.8× | 25.3× | 1.8× | 3.5% | — | 6.0% | 4.3% | 3.6% | 3.2× | 189 |
| CG | $14.3B | 18.4× | 9.1× | 3.0× | -11.9% | — | 16.9% | 11.5% | 11.5% | -1.5× | 146 |
| EVR | $11.2B | 20.7× | — | 2.9× | 29.5% | — | 15.3% | 29.1% | 29.1% | — | 147 |
| AMG | $9.9B | 16.8× | — | 4.8× | 1.6% | — | 34.5% | 22.1% | 12.1% | — | 131 |
| HLI | $9.6B | 22.2× | 14.7× | 3.7× | 9.5% | — | 16.3% | 18.2% | 18.2% | -2.1× | 125 |
| MORN | $8.4B | 25.5× | 12.6× | 3.4× | 7.5% | 61.0% | 15.3% | 30.6% | 16.3% | 0.8× | 92 |
| TPG | $8.0B | 106.5× | 12.3× | 1.7× | 33.4% | — | 4.0% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 1.2× | 67 |
| OWL | $7.1B | 104.1× | 21.4× | 12.5× | 7.6% | — | 13.9% | 3.6% | 1.4% | 6.5× | 138 |
| VCTR | $7.0B | 27.9× | 14.2× | 5.4× | 46.2% | — | 25.3% | 13.6% | 9.7% | 1.5× | 88 |
| FHI | $4.4B | 11.4× | 7.9× | 2.4× | 10.3% | — | 22.4% | 33.7% | 26.1% | -0.5× | 96 |
| LAZ | $3.7B | 17.7× | 11.0× | 1.2× | 1.5% | — | 7.4% | 27.2% | 9.3% | 0.6× | 77 |
| CNS | $3.7B | 24.4× | 19.1× | 6.7× | 7.5% | — | 27.6% | 27.3% | 27.3% | -0.8× | 65 |
| APAM | $2.6B | 9.0× | 6.8× | 2.2× | 7.6% | — | 24.3% | 66.2% | 46.2% | 0.5× | 79 |
| RPC | $1.0B | 54.6× | 20.3× | 3.4× | 0.3% | — | 6.6% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 5.1× | — |
| ABX | $828M | 23.5× | 11.1× | 3.5× | 110% | 87.7% | 15.5% | 8.7% | 4.4% | 3.4× | 19 |
| VRTS | $828M | 6.3× | 5.2× | 1.0× | -6.0% | — | 15.9% | 14.6% | 10.3% | 1.7× | 40 |
| GCMG | $773M | 30.1× | 7.0× | 1.4× | 8.5% | — | 8.1% | 168% | 10.0% | 1.4× | 18 |
| NOAH | $462M | 29.3× | — | 1.2× | 4.8% | — | 21.4% | 5.7% | 5.7% | — | 9 |
| HKHC | $405M | 80.4× | 30.2× | 5.6× | 30.5% | — | 7.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% | -3.0× | — |
| VALU | $390M | — | 68.7× | 11.7× | -4.7% | — | 64.7% | 20.0% | 20.0% | -4.5× | 11 |
| WHG | $181M | 24.0× | 28.2× | 1.9× | 3.2% | — | 7.2% | 5.6% | 5.6% | -4.8× | 14 |
Peers = companies sharing VALU's sector (Investment Advice) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
Average free cash flow across the last 3 positive fiscal years (FY2024, FY2025, FY2026). Smooths the cycle. Stock compensation is NOT charged — it is added back inside operating cash flow.
To be worth $41.55 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 3.3%/yr for a decade (off $18.9M on the 3-yr avg basis).
The market's 3.3% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
Default is 8.1% — this company's computed cost of capital (computed WACC), the same rate the Analysis tab discounts at.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares (market data) · net debt -$24.2M
mean 5.5% · volatility σ 29% · implied rate exceeded in 2/5 yrs
Central path = implied 3.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (29%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 66% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $12.2M dividends + $928K buybacks = $13.2M returned on $18.6M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 20%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
Where each multiple sits in its own 17-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 17-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 20% against ROIC 20% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 7.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Income | 22.6 | — | 18.7 | 26.7 | 28.9 | 24.4 | 17.1 | 12.1 |
| Income Tax | 14.2 | — | 17.3 | 16.8 | 14.4 | 16.5 | 19.5 | 23.3 |
| Net Income | 37.1 | — | 57.6 | 58.8 | 45.5 | 50.7 | 59.0 | 64.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on VALU: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Earns -4.23pts against its cost of capital — capital is being consumed, not created.
| Period | ROIC | Cost of capital | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2021 | 9.5% | 8.1% (today's — no rate published for this year) | 1.3pts |
| FY2022 | 13.9% | 8.1% (today's — no rate published for this year) | 5.8pts |
| FY2023 | 10.3% | 8.1% (today's — no rate published for this year) | 2.2pts |
| FY2024 | 7.4% | 8.1% (today's — no rate published for this year) | -0.7pts |
| FY2025 | 6.4% | 8.1% (today's — no rate published for this year) | -1.7pts |
| FY2026 | 3.5% | 8.1% (today's — no rate published for this year) | -4.7pts |
| Now | 20.0% | 8.1% | 11.9pts |
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2019 | not reported | 14.9% | 33.1% |
| FY2020 | not reported | 22.6% | 37.1% |
| FY2021 | not reported | 18.7% | 57.6% |
| FY2022 | not reported | 26.7% | 58.8% |
| FY2023 | not reported | 28.9% | 45.5% |
| FY2024 | not reported | 24.4% | 50.7% |
| FY2025 | not reported | 17.1% | 59.0% |
| FY2026 | not reported | 12.1% | 64.7% |
Return on equity (20%) and return on invested capital (20%) are within a couple of points in FY2026, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
Margins have compressed 3 years running even as the spread stayed positive.
Converts 0.96x of reported profit into cash — adequate, without much margin.
Capex has been below depreciation for 6 consecutive years (0.04x on average over the last 5). Spending less than the asset base is consuming flatters free cash flow now and defers the cost — though depreciation also covers amortisation of acquired intangibles, which capex is not meant to replace.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: share_based_compensation.
Debt is present but there is no positive EBITDA or no reported interest expense, so coverage cannot be measured.
Balance sheet at 2026-04-30. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage, stressed coverage, maturity schedule vs cash and one year of FCF, liquidity ratios.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: interest_expense.
At $41.55, free cash flow must compound 3.39%/yr for 10 years. It has done 2.56%/yr over 5 years.
| Fiscal year | FCF growth | Price requires |
|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | 50.4% | 3.4% |
| FY2023 | −26.3% | 3.4% |
| FY2024 | −1.3% | 3.4% |
| FY2025 | 12.0% | 3.4% |
| FY2026 | −7.4% | 3.4% |
The implied rate has been matched or beaten in 2 of the last 5 years.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $22M | $22M |
| Share-based comp | not reported | not reported |
| Other non-cash & working capital | −$3M | $19M |
| Operating cash flow | $19M | $19M |
| Capex | $0 | $19M |
| Free cash flow | $19M | $19M |
| Fiscal year | Revenue growth | Receivables growth | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | 0.3% | -57.9% | -58.3 points |
| FY2023 | -2.0% | 26.6% | 28.7 points |
| FY2024 | -5.6% | -38.3% | -32.8 points |
| FY2025 | -6.4% | 1.3% | 7.7 points |
| FY2026 | -4.7% | -22.0% | -17.4 points |
| Fiscal year | DSO | DIO | DPO | Cash conversion cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2021 | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported |
| FY2021 | 36 days | not reported | not reported | not reported |
| FY2022 | 15.1 days | not reported | not reported | not reported |
| FY2023 | 19.5 days | not reported | not reported | not reported |
| FY2024 | 12.8 days | not reported | not reported | not reported |
| FY2025 | 13.8 days | not reported | not reported | not reported |
| FY2026 | 11.3 days | not reported | not reported | not reported |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2021 | not reported |
| FY2021 | 5.7 percent |
| FY2022 | -0.6 percent |
| FY2023 | -0.1 percent |
| FY2024 | 0.8 percent |
| FY2025 | 0.3 percent |
| FY2026 | 2.0 percent |
Below the line, the asset base is being consumed faster than it is replaced.
Below the line for 6 consecutive years to the latest.
Depreciation here includes amortisation of acquired intangibles — goodwill written down over time, customer lists, acquired technology. Capex does not replace those and is not meant to, so an acquisitive or asset-light company sits below 1.0 permanently and correctly. The signal is cleanest for capital-intensive businesses, where the two measure the same physical base. For that reason this informs the earnings-quality verdict but never caps it.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $33.4M 100.0% | $35.1M 100.0% | $37.5M 100.0% | $39.7M 100.0% | $40.5M 100.0% | $40.4M 100.0% | — | $40.3M 100.0% | — | $36.3M 100.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $29.4M 87.9% | $29.1M 82.9% | $28.3M 75.6% | $28.2M 71.1% | $29.7M 73.3% | $32.9M 81.3% | — | $31.2M 77.4% | — | $30.8M 85.1% |
| Operating Income | $4.0M 12.1% | $6.0M 17.1% | $9.1M 24.4% | $11.5M 28.9% | $10.8M 26.7% | $7.5M 18.7% | — | $9.1M 22.6% | — | $5.4M 14.9% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $2.1M 6.2% | $2.1M 6.1% | $1.9M 5.2% | — | $18K 0.0% | $137K 0.3% | — | $279K 0.7% | — | $201K 0.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $7.8M 23.3% | $6.9M 19.5% | $6.2M 16.5% | $5.7M 14.4% | $6.8M 16.8% | $7.0M 17.3% | $5.7M | $5.7M 14.2% | $4.3M | $4.3M 11.9% |
| Net Income | $21.6M 64.7% | $20.7M 59.0% | $19.0M 50.7% | $18.1M 45.5% | $23.8M 58.8% | $23.3M 57.6% | $14.9M | $14.9M 37.1% | $12.0M | $12.0M 33.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.30 | $2.20 | $2.02 | $1.91 | $2.50 | $2.43 | — | $1.55 | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 9.4M | 9.4M | 9.4M | 9.5M | 9.5M | 9.6M | — | 9.6M | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.