Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 364 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 259 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $230.5B | 33.6× | 20.6× | 6.8× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| BHPLF | $220.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| SCCO | $162.8B | 37.6× | 21.0× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.3% | 39.3% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| TX | $107.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $99.7B | — | 12.0× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 7.9% | 1.0× | 1,775 |
| SHW | $91.6B | 36.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| AEM | $82.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| ECL | $80.5B | 39.2× | 23.7× | 5.0× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $68.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| CRH | $66.9B | 18.1× | 10.4× | 1.8× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| APD | $65.7B | — | 92.9× | 5.5× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $63.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| SYAXF | $63.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DD | $61.5B | — | — | 9.0× | 1.9% | 34.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 1,172 |
| WPM | $55.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| AU | $44.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| STLD | $38.5B | 33.3× | 20.7× | 2.1× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| VMC | $37.5B | 35.4× | 17.6× | 4.7× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $33.4B | 29.5× | 18.6× | 5.4× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| TCKRF | $32.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 |
| NTR | $32.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| AMRZ | $29.2B | 24.7× | 12.1× | 2.5× | 0.9% | 25.7% | 10.0% | 8.9% | 6.5% | 1.9× | 433 |
| GFIOF | $28.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| PPG | $26.6B | 17.2× | — | 1.7× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.8% | — | 1,003 |
| WDFC | $3.1B | 34.0× | 27.7× | 5.0× | 5.0% | 55.1% | 14.7% | 33.9% | 25.6% | 0.8× | 364 |
Peers = companies sharing WDFC's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $227.14 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 15.5%/yr for a decade (off $88M normalized FCF).
The market's 15.5% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt $29M
mean -9.8% · volatility σ 48% · implied rate exceeded in 2/8 yrs
Central path = implied 15.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (48%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 60% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $50M dividends + $12M buybacks = $63M returned on $83M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 9%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 26%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.0% on $87M of debt.
Cash of $58M fully covers short-term debt of $800000.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-07-31
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.6× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 44.9 | 45.1 | 45.4 | 46.0 | 50.9 | 49.0 | 46.6 | 44.9 |
| Gross Profit | 55.1 | 54.9 | 54.6 | 54.0 | 49.1 | 51.0 | 53.4 | 55.1 |
| R&D | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| SG&A | 29.7 | 29.3 | 29.9 | 29.8 | 26.7 | 28.8 | 31.1 | 32.2 |
| Operating Income | 19.2 | 19.5 | 18.9 | 18.2 | 16.8 | 16.7 | 16.3 | 16.7 |
| Income Tax | 2.4 | 5.9 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 1.7 |
| Net Income | 16.0 | 13.2 | 14.9 | 14.4 | 13.0 | 12.3 | 11.8 | 14.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on WDFC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-07-31 · 20d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $620.0M 100.0% | $590.6M 100.0% | $537.3M 100.0% | $518.8M 100.0% | $488.1M 100.0% | $408.5M 100.0% | $423.4M 100.0% | $408.5M 100.0% | $380.5M 100.0% | $380.7M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $278.6M 44.9% | $275.3M 46.6% | $263.0M 49.0% | $264.1M 50.9% | $224.4M 46.0% | $185.5M 45.4% | $191.0M 45.1% | $183.3M 44.9% | $166.6M 43.8% | $166.3M 43.7% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $166.6M 43.8% | $166.3M 43.7% |
| Gross Profit | $341.3M 55.1% | $315.2M 53.4% | $274.2M 51.0% | $254.8M 49.1% | $263.7M 54.0% | $223.0M 54.6% | $232.3M 54.9% | $225.3M 55.1% | $213.9M 56.2% | $214.4M 56.3% |
| Research & Development | $8.7M 1.4% | $8.0M 1.4% | $6.2M 1.2% | $5.1M 1.0% | $5.6M 1.1% | $6.0M 1.5% | $6.5M 1.5% | $7.0M 1.7% | $8.4M 2.2% | $7.7M 2.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $199.9M 32.2% | $183.9M 31.1% | $154.7M 28.8% | $138.7M 26.7% | $145.5M 29.8% | $122.0M 29.9% | $123.9M 29.3% | $121.4M 29.7% | $114.6M 30.1% | $117.8M 30.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $237.6M 38.3% | $218.9M 37.1% | $184.5M 34.3% | $167.4M 32.3% | $174.9M 35.8% | $145.8M 35.7% | $150.0M 35.4% | $146.7M 35.9% | $138.0M 36.3% | $143.0M 37.6% |
| Operating Income | $103.8M 16.7% | $96.4M 16.3% | $89.7M 16.7% | $87.3M 16.8% | $88.8M 18.2% | $77.2M 18.9% | $82.4M 19.5% | $78.6M 19.2% | $75.9M 19.9% | $71.3M 18.7% |
| Interest Expense | $3.4M 0.6% | $4.3M 0.7% | $5.6M 1.0% | $2.7M 0.5% | $2.4M 0.5% | $2.4M 0.6% | $2.5M 0.6% | $4.2M 1.0% | $2.6M 0.7% | $1.7M 0.4% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $517K 0.1% | $474K 0.1% | $231K 0.0% | $102K 0.0% | $81K 0.0% | $93K 0.0% | $155K 0.0% | $454K 0.1% | $508K 0.1% | $683K 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $757K 0.1% | -$1.0M -0.2% | $822K 0.2% | -$582K -0.1% | -$28K -0.0% | $641K 0.2% | $774K 0.2% | $339K 0.1% | $787K 0.2% | $2.5M 0.6% |
| Pretax Income | $101.6M 16.4% | $91.5M 15.5% | $85.2M 15.9% | $84.1M 16.2% | $86.5M 17.7% | $75.5M 18.5% | $80.8M 19.1% | $75.2M 18.4% | $74.6M 19.6% | $72.8M 19.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $10.6M 1.7% | $21.9M 3.7% | $19.2M 3.6% | $16.8M 3.2% | $16.3M 3.3% | $14.8M 3.6% | $24.9M 5.9% | $10.0M 2.4% | $21.7M 5.7% | $20.2M 5.3% |
| Net Income | $91.0M 14.7% | $69.6M 11.8% | $66.0M 12.3% | $67.3M 13.0% | $70.2M 14.4% | $60.7M 14.9% | $55.9M 13.2% | $65.2M 16.0% | $52.9M 13.9% | $52.6M 13.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.70 | $5.12 | $4.84 | $4.91 | $5.11 | $4.41 | $4.03 | $4.65 | $3.73 | $3.65 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.69 | $5.11 | $4.83 | $4.90 | $5.09 | $4.40 | $4.02 | $4.64 | $3.72 | $3.64 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 13.5M | 13.6M | 13.6M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.8M | 13.9M | 14.1M | 14.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 13.6M | 13.6M | 13.6M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.8M | 14.0M | 14.1M | 14.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.