Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 171 of 5,944 reporting institutions (90th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.96B 100.0% | $4.79B 100.0% | $4.71B 100.0% | $4.71B 100.0% | $4.22B 100.0% | $4.11B 100.0% | $3.54B 100.0% | $3.51B 100.0% | $3.47B 100.0% | $3.14B 100.0% |
| Gross Profit | $1.24B 25.0% | $1.20B 25.0% | $1.18B 24.9% | $1.20B 25.5% | $1.12B 26.4% | $1.10B 26.8% | $938.2M 26.5% | $935.0M 26.6% | $912.5M 26.3% | $863.5M 27.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.13B 22.7% | $1.07B 22.4% | $1.04B 22.1% | $1.04B 22.1% | $969.0M 22.9% | $937.3M 22.8% | $853.6M 24.1% | $852.3M 24.3% | $834.0M 24.1% | $765.2M 24.4% |
| Operating Income | $113.7M 2.3% | $126.4M 2.6% | $133.1M 2.8% | $157.1M 3.3% | $146.7M 3.5% | $163.2M 4.0% | $84.6M 2.4% | $82.7M 2.4% | $78.5M 2.3% | $98.3M 3.1% |
| Interest Expense | $43K 0.0% | $45K 0.0% | $41K 0.0% | $32K 0.0% | $32K 0.0% | $35K 0.0% | $55K 0.0% | $288K 0.0% | $946K 0.0% | $242K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$4.4M -0.1% | -$3.4M -0.1% | -$3.7M -0.1% | $3.8M 0.1% | -$3.4M -0.1% | -$3.3M -0.1% | -$3.0M -0.1% | $919K 0.0% | -$2.1M -0.1% | — |
| Pretax Income | $123.9M 2.5% | $144.9M 3.0% | $142.7M 3.0% | $160.8M 3.4% | $148.3M 3.5% | $163.7M 4.0% | $88.6M 2.5% | $82.1M 2.3% | $79.0M 2.3% | $124.7M 4.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $30.3M 0.6% | $38.9M 0.8% | $41.8M 0.9% | $35.6M 0.8% | $39.5M 0.9% | $44.8M 1.1% | $20.7M 0.6% | $19.4M 0.6% | -$19.4M -0.6% | $37.5M 1.2% |
| Net Income | $93.7M 1.9% | $106.0M 2.2% | $100.9M 2.1% | $125.2M 2.7% | $108.8M 2.6% | $118.9M 2.9% | $68.0M 1.9% | $62.7M 1.8% | $98.4M 2.8% | $87.2M 2.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.65 | $3.94 | $3.75 | $4.65 | $4.05 | $4.42 | $2.53 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.65 | $3.94 | $3.75 | $4.65 | $4.05 | $4.42 | $2.53 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 25.7M | 26.9M | 26.9M | 26.9M | 26.9M | 26.9M | 26.9M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 25.7M | 26.9M | 26.9M | 26.9M | 26.9M | 26.9M | 26.9M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $74.66 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 17.3%/yr for a decade (off $43M normalized FCF).
The market's 17.3% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$117M
mean 84.7% · volatility σ 279% · implied rate exceeded in 4/9 yrs
Central path = implied 17.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (279%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (728%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $35M dividends + $140M buybacks = $175M returned on $5M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit | 26.6 | 26.5 | 26.8 | 26.4 | 25.5 | 24.9 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| SG&A | 24.3 | 24.1 | 22.8 | 22.9 | 22.1 | 22.1 | 22.4 | 22.7 |
| Operating Income | 2.4 | 2.4 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.3 |
| Income Tax | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Net Income | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on WMK: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| WMK | $1.8B | 20.4× | 7.3× | 0.4× | 3.5% | 25.0% | 1.9% | 6.9% | 6.9% | — | 171 |
Peers = companies sharing WMK's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.