Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 195 of 5,944 reporting institutions (91th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.92 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 5.7%/yr for a decade (off $118M normalized FCF).
The market's 5.7% is more conservative than its 5-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.28B shares · net debt $1.2B
mean 32.0% · volatility σ 171% · implied rate exceeded in 2/4 yrs
Central path = implied 5.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (171%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $187M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 0%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~8.8% on $1.5B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 57.0 | 57.2 | 58.2 | 59.8 | 62.4 | 62.0 | 61.3 |
| Gross Profit | 43.0 | 42.8 | 41.8 | 40.2 | 37.6 | 38.0 | 38.7 |
| SG&A | 40.1 | 38.9 | 37.2 | 36.5 | 37.0 | 37.9 | 36.6 |
| Operating Income | 2.5 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 3.7 | -18.9 | 0.1 | 2.0 |
| Income Tax | -0.8 | -0.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | -0.4 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | -2.2 | -0.5 | 2.8 | 1.5 | -20.5 | -1.7 | 0.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on WOOF: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 16d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.96B 100.0% | $6.12B 100.0% | $6.26B 100.0% | $6.04B 100.0% | $5.81B 100.0% | $4.92B 100.0% | $4.43B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $3.66B 61.3% | $3.79B 62.0% | $3.90B 62.4% | $3.61B 59.8% | $3.38B 58.2% | $2.81B 57.2% | $2.53B 57.0% |
| Gross Profit | $2.31B 38.7% | $2.32B 38.0% | $2.35B 37.6% | $2.43B 40.2% | $2.43B 41.8% | $2.11B 42.8% | $1.91B 43.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $2.18B 36.6% | $2.32B 37.9% | $2.31B 37.0% | $2.20B 36.5% | $2.16B 37.2% | $1.91B 38.9% | $1.78B 40.1% |
| Operating Income | $120.4M 2.0% | $7.1M 0.1% | -$1.18B -18.9% | $225.6M 3.7% | $266.1M 4.6% | $194.4M 4.0% | $110.6M 2.5% |
| Interest Expense | $131.2M 2.2% | $143.5M 2.3% | $150.9M 2.4% | $101.6M 1.7% | $77.4M 1.3% | $219.1M 4.5% | $253.0M 5.7% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $6.3M 0.1% | $3.7M 0.1% | $3.4M 0.1% | $1.0M 0.0% | $62K 0.0% | $653K 0.0% | $335K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $0 0.0% | $4.8M 0.1% | $4.7M 0.1% | -$12.7M -0.2% | $34.5M 0.6% | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $15.3M 0.3% | -$109.3M -1.8% | -$1.31B -20.9% | $112.3M 1.9% | $202.4M 3.5% | -$41.6M -0.8% | -$142.1M -3.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $6.3M 0.1% | -$7.5M -0.1% | -$27.6M -0.4% | $35.3M 0.6% | $53.5M 0.9% | -$3.3M -0.1% | -$35.7M -0.8% |
| Net Income | $9.1M 0.2% | -$101.8M -1.7% | -$1.28B -20.5% | $89.9M 1.5% | $159.8M 2.8% | -$26.5M -0.5% | -$95.9M -2.2% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.03 | $-0.37 | $-4.78 | $0.34 | $0.62 | $-0.13 | $-0.46 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.37 | $-4.78 | $0.34 | $0.62 | $-0.13 | $-0.46 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 279.6M | 273.4M | 267.5M | 265.5M | 264K | 211K | 209K |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 286.1M | 273.4M | 267.5M | 266.0M | 265K | 211K | 209K |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| WOOF | $816M | 97.3× | 6.5× | 0.1× | -2.5% | 38.7% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 4.7× | 195 |
Peers = companies sharing WOOF's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.