Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Top 1 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$12M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 514%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 10-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 10-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2023 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 62.5 | 57.6 | 59.0 | 59.8 | 65.9 | 64.3 | 82.8 | 81.7 |
| Gross Profit | 37.5 | 42.4 | 41.0 | 40.2 | 34.1 | 35.7 | 17.2 | 18.3 |
| SG&A | 97.1 | 24.8 | 32.4 | 23.0 | 29.0 | 34.4 | 39.4 | 17.3 |
| Operating Income | -105.5 | -19.9 | -29.9 | -25.0 | -37.4 | -34.4 | -71.2 | -34.5 |
| Net Income | -116.8 | -27.1 | -33.8 | -26.8 | -38.6 | -35.6 | -72.3 | -43.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on WTER: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2023
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 | FY2015 | FY2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $63.8M 100.0% | $54.8M 100.0% | $46.1M 100.0% | $38.4M 100.0% | $32.2M 100.0% | $19.8M 100.0% | $12.8M 100.0% | $7.1M 100.0% | $3.7M 100.0% | $553K 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $52.1M 81.7% | $45.4M 82.8% | $29.6M 64.3% | $25.3M 65.9% | $19.3M 59.8% | $11.7M 59.0% | $7.4M 57.6% | $4.4M 62.5% | $2.5M 68.4% | $412K 74.5% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | $11.7M 59.0% | $7.4M 57.6% | $4.4M 62.5% | $2.5M 68.4% | $412K 74.5% |
| Gross Profit | $11.6M 18.3% | $9.4M 17.2% | $16.4M 35.7% | $13.1M 34.1% | $12.9M 40.2% | $8.1M 41.0% | $5.4M 42.4% | $2.7M 37.5% | $1.2M 31.6% | $141K 25.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $11.0M 17.3% | $21.6M 39.4% | $15.9M 34.4% | $11.1M 29.0% | $7.4M 23.0% | $6.4M 32.4% | $3.2M 24.8% | $6.9M 97.1% | $6.5M 176.2% | $3.9M 697.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $33.7M 52.8% | $48.4M 88.4% | $32.3M 70.1% | $27.5M 71.6% | $21.0M 65.2% | $14.1M 70.9% | $8.0M 62.3% | $10.1M 143.0% | $8.1M 218.4% | $4.4M 800.0% |
| Operating Income | -$22.0M -34.5% | -$39.0M -71.2% | -$15.8M -34.4% | -$14.4M -37.4% | -$8.1M -25.0% | -$5.9M -29.9% | -$2.5M -19.9% | -$7.5M -105.5% | -$6.9M -186.8% | — |
| Interest Expense | $3.0M 4.7% | $917K 1.7% | $576K 1.2% | $449K 1.2% | $554K 1.7% | $465K 2.3% | $367K 2.9% | $350K 4.9% | $137K 3.7% | $11K 2.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | $0 0.0% | $103 0.0% | $97 0.0% | $11 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$5.4M -8.4% | -$586K -1.1% | -$576K -1.2% | -$449K -1.2% | -$554K -1.7% | -$757K -3.8% | -$916K -7.2% | -$804K -11.3% | -$225K -6.1% | $51K 9.2% |
| Net Income | -$27.4M -43.0% | -$39.6M -72.3% | -$16.4M -35.6% | -$14.8M -38.6% | -$8.6M -26.8% | -$6.7M -33.8% | -$3.5M -27.1% | -$8.3M -116.8% | -$7.1M -192.9% | -$4.2M -765.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-2.99 | $-5.99 | $-0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-2.99 | $-5.99 | $-0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 9.2M | 6.6M | 69.5M | 43.0M | 31.9M | 20.6M | 15.6M | 3.8M | 2.2M | 80.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 9.2M | 6.6M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| WTER | $375202 | — | — | 0.0× | 16.4% | 18.3% | -43.0% | 514% | 514% | — | 1 |
Peers = companies sharing WTER's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.