Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -2.65% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 8 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| XELB | $6M | — | — | 1.3× | -40.2% | 100% | -354% | -97.2% | -63.7% | -1.0× | 8 |
Peers = companies sharing XELB's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -64%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1M covers the $0 due within a year 1150000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-03-31 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~22.0% on $9M of debt.
Cash of $1M is below short-term debt of $3M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.9M 100.0% | $8.3M 100.0% | $17.8M 100.0% | $25.8M 100.0% | $37.9M 100.0% | $29.4M 100.0% | $41.7M 100.0% | $35.5M 100.0% | $31.7M 100.0% | $32.7M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | $445K 5.4% | $6.9M 39.0% | $8.0M 31.0% | $10.7M 28.1% | $5.5M 18.5% | $10.3M 24.6% | $2.7M 7.6% | — | $196K 0.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $196K 0.6% |
| Gross Profit | $4.9M 100.0% | $7.8M 94.6% | $10.8M 61.0% | $17.8M 69.0% | $27.3M 71.9% | $24.0M 81.5% | $31.5M 75.4% | $32.8M 92.4% | $31.7M 100.0% | $32.6M 99.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $4.6M 94.1% | $6.8M 82.8% | $13.3M 74.7% | $16.3M 63.1% | $14.4M 37.9% | $9.7M 33.1% | $5.6M 13.3% | $5.2M 14.7% | $4.7M 14.8% | $5.7M 17.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $8.6M 173.5% | $12.8M 154.5% | $23.2M 130.5% | $620K 2.4% | $39.8M 105.0% | $40.4M 137.4% | $36.9M 88.5% | $28.8M 81.3% | $40.9M 129.1% | $31.2M 95.5% |
| Operating Income | -$13.2M -267.9% | -$21.4M -259.2% | -$20.6M -116.3% | -$2.3M -8.8% | -$12.6M -33.1% | -$16.4M -55.7% | -$2.6M -6.3% | $3.9M 11.1% | -$9.2M -29.1% | $4.9M 14.9% |
| Interest Expense | $2.1M 42.1% | $618K 7.5% | $113K 0.6% | $1.2M 4.6% | $1.9M 5.1% | $1.2M 4.1% | $1.3M 3.1% | $912K 2.6% | $1.2M 3.7% | $1.3M 4.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$17.5M -354.3% | -$22.3M -270.5% | -$21.0M -118.4% | -$5.8M -22.4% | -$16.1M -42.5% | -$17.6M -59.8% | -$4.1M -9.8% | $2.9M 8.2% | -$10.6M -33.3% | $3.0M 9.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $75K 1.5% | $220K 2.7% | $1.2M 6.8% | -$431K -1.7% | -$3.1M -8.2% | -$4.5M -15.3% | -$642K -1.5% | $1.8M 5.2% | -$447K -1.4% | $315K 1.0% |
| Net Income | -$17.5M -353.5% | -$22.4M -271.2% | -$21.1M -118.6% | -$4.0M -15.6% | -$12.2M -32.1% | -$12.9M -43.9% | -$3.4M -8.2% | $1.1M 3.1% | -$10.1M -31.9% | $2.7M 8.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-5.08 | $-9.84 | $-10.68 | $-0.20 | $-0.63 | $-0.68 | $-0.18 | $0.06 | $-0.55 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-5.08 | $-9.84 | $-10.68 | $-0.20 | $-0.63 | $-0.68 | $-0.18 | $0.06 | $-0.55 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 3.4M | 2.3M | 2.0M | 19.6M | 19.5M | 19.1M | 18.9M | 18.3M | 18.5M | 18.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 3.4M | 2.3M | 2.0M | 19.6M | 19.5M | 19.1M | 18.9M | 18.3M | 18.5M | 19.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $204000 buybacks = $204000 returned on -$7M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 4th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 7.6 | 24.6 | 18.5 | 28.1 | 31.0 | 39.0 | 5.4 | — |
| Gross Profit | 92.4 | 75.4 | 81.5 | 71.9 | 69.0 | 61.0 | 94.6 | 100.0 |
| SG&A | 14.7 | 13.3 | 33.1 | 37.9 | 63.1 | 74.7 | 82.8 | 94.1 |
| Operating Income | 11.1 | -6.3 | -55.7 | -33.1 | -8.8 | -116.3 | -259.2 | -267.9 |
| Income Tax | 5.2 | -1.5 | -15.3 | -8.2 | -1.7 | 6.8 | 2.7 | 1.5 |
| Net Income | 3.1 | -8.2 | -43.9 | -32.1 | -15.6 | -118.6 | -271.2 | -353.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on XELB: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.