Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 1,381 of 5,944 reporting institutions (99th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -21%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $709M covers the $28M due within a year 25.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~1431.6% on $38M of debt.
Cash of $709M fully covers short-term debt of $38M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.21B 100.0% | $7.55B 100.0% | $7.08B 100.0% | $6.84B 100.0% | $6.58B 100.0% | $5.65B 100.0% | $5.60B 100.0% | $5.69B 100.0% | $5.88B 100.0% | $6.36B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.48B 30.2% | $2.12B 28.1% | $1.77B 25.1% | $1.75B 25.5% | $1.73B 26.2% | $1.51B 26.6% | $1.24B 22.1% | $1.63B 28.7% | $2.95B 50.3% | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.26B 15.4% | $1.18B 15.6% | $1.19B 16.9% | $1.14B 16.7% | $1.06B 16.1% | $1.06B 18.8% | $917.0M 16.4% | $895.0M 15.7% | $999.0M 17.0% | — |
| Total Operating Expenses | $5.64B 68.7% | $5.15B 68.2% | $4.76B 67.2% | $4.66B 68.0% | $4.45B 67.5% | $4.15B 73.4% | $3.67B 65.5% | $3.39B 59.6% | $3.12B 53.0% | — |
| Operating Income | $2.57B 31.3% | $2.40B 31.8% | $2.32B 32.8% | $2.19B 32.0% | $2.14B 32.5% | $1.50B 26.6% | $1.93B 34.5% | $2.30B 40.4% | $2.76B 47.0% | $1.68B 26.5% |
| Interest Expense | $544.0M 6.6% | $542.0M 7.2% | $602.0M 8.5% | $558.0M 8.2% | $551.0M 8.4% | $558.0M 9.9% | $519.0M 9.3% | $496.0M 8.7% | $473.0M 8.0% | $331.0M 5.2% |
| Pretax Income | $2.08B 25.3% | $1.90B 25.2% | $1.82B 25.7% | $1.66B 24.3% | $1.67B 25.4% | $1.02B 18.0% | $1.37B 24.5% | $1.84B 32.3% | $2.27B 38.7% | $1.34B 21.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $518.0M 6.3% | $414.0M 5.5% | $221.0M 3.1% | $337.0M 4.9% | $99.0M 1.5% | $116.0M 2.1% | $79.0M 1.4% | $297.0M 5.2% | $934.0M 15.9% | — |
| Net Income | $1.56B 19.0% | $1.49B 19.7% | $1.60B 22.6% | $1.32B 19.4% | $1.57B 23.9% | $904.0M 16.0% | $1.29B 23.1% | $1.54B 27.1% | $1.34B 22.8% | $1.64B 25.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $5.59 | $5.28 | $5.68 | $4.63 | $5.30 | $2.99 | $4.23 | $4.80 | $3.86 | $4.17 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.55 | $5.22 | $5.59 | $4.57 | $5.21 | $2.94 | $4.14 | $4.69 | $3.77 | $4.10 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 279.0M | 282.0M | 281.0M | 286.0M | 297.0M | 302.0M | 306.0M | 322.0M | 347.0M | 394.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 281.0M | 285.0M | 285.0M | 290.0M | 302.0M | 307.0M | 313.0M | 329.0M | 355.0M | 400.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $152.37 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 12.6%/yr for a decade (off $1.5B normalized FCF).
The market's 12.6% is more optimistic than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.28B shares · net debt -$671M
mean 12.3% · volatility σ 17% · implied rate exceeded in 5/8 yrs
Central path = implied 12.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (17%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 48% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $789M dividends + $552M buybacks = $1.3B returned on $1.6B FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 11%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| YUM | $42.5B | 27.4× | 15.1× | 5.2× | 8.8% | 69.8% | 19.0% | -21.3% | -21.4% | 0.0× | 1,381 |
Peers = companies sharing YUM's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 85th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 28.7 | 22.1 | 26.6 | 26.2 | 25.5 | 25.1 | 28.1 | 30.2 |
| SG&A | 15.7 | 16.4 | 18.8 | 16.1 | 16.7 | 16.9 | 15.6 | 15.4 |
| Operating Income | 40.4 | 34.5 | 26.6 | 32.5 | 32.0 | 32.8 | 31.8 | 31.3 |
| Income Tax | 5.2 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 4.9 | 3.1 | 5.5 | 6.3 |
| Net Income | 27.1 | 23.1 | 16.0 | 23.9 | 19.4 | 22.6 | 19.7 | 19.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on YUM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.