Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.46% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $1.09 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 14.6%/yr for a decade (off $147846 normalized FCF).
The market's 14.6% is more optimistic than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$2M
mean -260.2% · volatility σ 213% · implied rate exceeded in 0/2 yrs
Central path = implied 14.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (213%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 6 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.2M 100.0% | $108.2M 100.0% | $111.6M 100.0% | $102.4M 100.0% | $99.4M 100.0% | $86.8M 100.0% | $63.9M 100.0% | $54.9M 100.0% | $45.0M 100.0% | $36.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $67.2M 94.3% | $101.7M 93.9% | $110.3M 98.8% | $94.8M 92.6% | $92.9M 93.5% | $82.9M 95.5% | $48.2M 75.5% | $36.6M 66.7% | $31.8M 70.8% | $25.3M 68.8% |
| Gross Profit | $4.0M 5.7% | $6.5M 6.1% | $1.3M 1.2% | $7.6M 7.4% | $6.5M 6.5% | $3.9M 4.5% | $15.6M 24.5% | $18.3M 33.3% | $13.1M 29.2% | $11.5M 31.2% |
| Research & Development | $860K 1.2% | $1.2M 1.1% | $1.3M 1.1% | $987K 1.0% | $1.2M 1.2% | $1.1M 1.3% | $1.5M 2.3% | $1.7M 3.0% | $1.3M 3.0% | $1.3M 3.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $4.1M 5.8% | $4.8M 4.5% | $5.1M 4.6% | $5.4M 5.3% | $5.8M 5.8% | $2.5M 2.9% | $2.9M 4.5% | $4.1M 7.4% | $1.8M 4.0% | $1.6M 4.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $8.3M 11.6% | $8.3M 7.6% | $61.7M 55.3% | $11.6M 11.3% | $10.1M 10.2% | $5.8M 6.7% | $7.0M 11.0% | $8.7M 15.8% | $5.0M 11.2% | $3.9M 10.5% |
| Operating Income | -$4.3M -6.0% | -$1.7M -1.6% | -$60.4M -54.2% | -$4.0M -3.9% | -$3.7M -3.7% | -$1.9M -2.2% | $8.6M 13.5% | $9.6M 17.5% | $8.1M 18.0% | $7.6M 20.7% |
| Interest Expense | $330K 0.5% | $1.2M 1.1% | $1.6M 1.4% | $3.5M 3.4% | $1.2M 1.2% | $1.0M 1.2% | $1.2M 1.8% | $1.2M 2.3% | $1.2M 2.8% | $1.4M 3.9% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | $15K 0.0% | $37K 0.0% | $109K 0.1% | $14K 0.0% | $7K 0.0% | $24K 0.0% | $11K 0.0% | $24K 0.1% | $51K 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $237K 0.3% | -$1.1M -1.0% | -$1.3M -1.2% | -$3.4M -3.4% | -$701K -0.7% | -$386K -0.4% | -$205K -0.3% | -$1.1M -2.0% | -$1.2M -2.6% | -$1.2M -3.3% |
| Pretax Income | -$4.0M -5.6% | -$2.8M -2.6% | -$61.8M -55.3% | -$7.4M -7.2% | -$4.4M -4.4% | -$2.3M -2.6% | $8.4M 13.2% | $8.5M 15.5% | $6.9M 15.4% | $6.4M 17.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$948 -0.0% | $12K 0.0% | -$460K -0.4% | -$1.3M -1.3% | -$552K -0.6% | -$1.4M -1.6% | $248K 0.4% | $1.4M 2.5% | $995K 2.2% | $1.1M 3.0% |
| Net Income | -$4.0M -5.6% | -$2.8M -2.6% | -$61.1M -54.7% | -$6.1M -5.9% | -$3.8M -3.8% | -$826K -1.0% | $8.1M 12.7% | $7.0M 12.8% | $5.9M 13.1% | $5.2M 14.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.70 | $-0.57 | $-10.76 | $-0.21 | $-0.17 | $-0.05 | $0.49 | $0.52 | $0.56 | $0.59 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.70 | $-0.57 | $-10.76 | $-0.21 | $-0.17 | $-0.05 | $0.49 | $0.51 | $0.56 | $0.59 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 5.7M | 4.9M | 4.5M | 29.3M | 21.9M | 16.6M | 16.6M | 13.6M | 11.0M | 9.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 5.7M | 4.9M | 4.5M | 29.4M | 22.6M | 16.6M | 16.6M | 13.6M | 11.0M | 9.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $147846 FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -16%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 66.7 | 75.5 | 95.5 | 93.5 | 92.6 | 98.8 | 93.9 | 94.3 |
| Gross Profit | 33.3 | 24.5 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 6.1 | 5.7 |
| R&D | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| SG&A | 7.4 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Operating Income | 17.5 | 13.5 | -2.2 | -3.7 | -3.9 | -54.2 | -1.6 | -6.0 |
| Income Tax | 2.5 | 0.4 | -1.6 | -0.6 | -1.3 | -0.4 | 0.0 | -0.0 |
| Net Income | 12.8 | 12.7 | -1.0 | -3.8 | -5.9 | -54.7 | -2.6 | -5.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ZKIN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 259 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $230.5B | 33.6× | 20.6× | 6.8× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| BHPLF | $220.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| SCCO | $162.8B | 37.6× | 21.0× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.3% | 39.3% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| TX | $107.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $99.7B | — | 12.0× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 7.9% | 1.0× | 1,775 |
| SHW | $91.6B | 36.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| AEM | $82.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| ECL | $80.5B | 39.2× | 23.7× | 5.0× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $68.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| CRH | $66.9B | 18.1× | 10.4× | 1.8× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| APD | $65.7B | — | 92.9× | 5.5× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $63.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| SYAXF | $63.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DD | $61.5B | — | — | 9.0× | 1.9% | 34.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 1,172 |
| WPM | $55.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| AU | $44.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| STLD | $38.5B | 33.3× | 20.7× | 2.1× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| VMC | $37.5B | 35.4× | 17.6× | 4.7× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $33.4B | 29.5× | 18.6× | 5.4× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| TCKRF | $32.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 |
| NTR | $32.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| AMRZ | $29.2B | 24.7× | 12.1× | 2.5× | 0.9% | 25.7% | 10.0% | 8.9% | 6.5% | 1.9× | 433 |
| GFIOF | $28.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| PPG | $26.6B | 17.2× | — | 1.7× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.8% | — | 1,003 |
| ZKIN | $7M | — | — | 0.1× | -34.2% | 5.7% | -5.6% | -16.3% | -16.3% | — | 6 |
Peers = companies sharing ZKIN's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.