Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +2.69% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 1111 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLY | $1.05T | 51.0× | — | 16.1× | 44.7% | 83.0% | 31.7% | 77.8% | 29.9% | — | 4,193 |
| AKTX | $679.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | -61.1% | -61.1% | — | 1 |
| JNJ | $620.1B | 23.4× | — | 6.6× | 6.0% | 67.9% | 28.5% | 32.9% | 20.7% | — | 4,451 |
| ABBV | $435.4B | 104.3× | 31.4× | 7.1× | 8.6% | 70.2% | 6.9% | -129% | 6.6% | 4.2× | 3,895 |
| UNH | $374.0B | 31.2× | 21.4× | 0.8× | 11.8% | 88.7% | 2.7% | 12.0% | 6.8% | 3.9× | 2,891 |
| BDRX | $359.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| MRK | $321.1B | 17.6× | — | 4.9× | 1.3% | 74.8% | 28.1% | 34.7% | 17.9% | — | 3,594 |
| NVSEF | $289.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| AZN | $250.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,248 |
| AMGN | $219.7B | 28.7× | 18.3× | 6.0× | 10.0% | 67.2% | 21.0% | 89.1% | 13.1% | 3.5× | 3,014 |
| TMO | $217.8B | 32.6× | 28.5× | 4.9× | 3.9% | — | 15.1% | 12.6% | 7.0% | 4.9× | 2,481 |
| ABT | $183.9B | 28.4× | 19.5× | 4.2× | 5.7% | 56.4% | 14.7% | 12.5% | 10.5% | 1.0× | 2,964 |
| GILD | $163.5B | 19.4× | 18.1× | 5.5× | 2.4% | 78.8% | 28.9% | 37.5% | 17.9% | 2.4× | 2,218 |
| PFE | $146.7B | 19.0× | — | 2.3× | -1.6% | 74.3% | 12.4% | 9.0% | 5.1% | — | 2,838 |
| DHR | $141.1B | 39.5× | 29.3× | 5.7× | 2.9% | 59.1% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 5.1% | 3.4× | 2,083 |
| ISRG | $133.2B | 47.7× | 36.6× | 13.2× | 20.5% | 66.0% | 28.4% | 16.0% | 16.0% | — | 2,190 |
| SYK | $128.8B | 40.1× | 21.8× | 5.1× | 11.2% | 64.0% | 12.9% | 14.5% | 8.5% | 2.5× | 2,196 |
| CVS | $126.0B | 71.3× | 12.7× | 0.3× | 7.8% | 45.0% | 0.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 0.0× | 1,795 |
| VRTX | $123.1B | 31.6× | 26.9× | 10.3× | 8.9% | 86.2% | 32.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | — | 1,609 |
| MDT | $110.1B | 23.1× | 11.7× | 3.0× | 8.4% | 65.0% | 13.2% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 0.2× | 2,114 |
| GLAXF | $106.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| MCK | $102.7B | 22.9× | 16.2× | 0.3× | 12.4% | 3.6% | 1.2% | -219% | 109% | 1.0× | 1,946 |
| SNYNF | $101.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| HCA | $92.0B | 14.5× | — | 1.2× | 7.1% | — | 9.0% | -113% | 16.8% | — | 1,346 |
| ELV | $86.4B | 15.5× | 14.8× | 0.4× | 12.5% | 89.4% | 2.8% | 12.9% | 7.6% | 4.2× | 1,397 |
| ZVRA | $599M | 7.8× | — | 5.6× | 351% | — | 78.2% | 53.8% | 38.4% | -1.1× | 145 |
Peers = companies sharing ZVRA's sector (Healthcare) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 38%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $62M covers the $0 due within a year 62406000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-09-30 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~12.9% on $62M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$2M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $106.5M 100.0% | $23.6M 100.0% | $27.5M 100.0% | $10.2M 100.0% | $28.6M 100.0% | $13.3M 100.0% | $12.8M 100.0% | $0 | — | — |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | $2.9M 10.7% | $222K 2.2% | $2.1M 7.2% | — | $10.0M 77.9% | $0 | — | — |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | $10.2M 35.5% | $8.8M 66.5% | $19.4M 151.2% | $41.8M | $20.6M | $20.5M |
| Selling, General & Admin | $77.6M 72.9% | $54.9M 232.4% | $34.3M 125.0% | $15.0M 148.0% | $8.7M 30.4% | $7.9M 59.6% | $10.8M 84.2% | $12.5M | $12.8M | $14.0M |
| Total Operating Expenses | $90.4M 84.9% | $97.0M 410.7% | $74.1M 269.9% | $52.7M 518.9% | $20.9M 73.0% | $18.9M 142.2% | $33.2M 258.4% | $55.9M | $33.4M | $37.5M |
| Operating Income | -$62.9M -59.1% | -$87.0M -368.5% | -$49.6M -180.6% | -$42.6M -418.9% | $7.7M 27.0% | -$5.6M -42.2% | -$20.3M -158.4% | -$55.9M | -$33.4M | -$37.5M |
| Interest Expense | $8.0M 7.5% | $7.4M 31.1% | $1.5M 5.5% | $335K 3.3% | $226K 0.8% | $4.8M 36.0% | $4.9M 37.8% | $5.5M | $5.8M | $5.5M |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $149.6M 140.5% | -$3.1M -13.3% | $3.6M 12.9% | $15.8M 155.1% | -$16.3M -56.7% | -$7.2M -54.1% | -$4.2M -32.8% | -$689K | -$10.1M | $21.0M |
| Pretax Income | $86.7M 81.4% | -$90.1M -381.8% | -$46.0M -167.7% | -$26.8M -263.8% | -$8.5M -29.7% | -$12.8M -96.3% | -$24.5M -191.2% | -$56.6M | -$43.4M | -$16.5M |
| Income Tax Expense | $3.4M 3.2% | $15.4M 65.1% | $0 0.0% | -$33K -0.3% | $34K 0.1% | -$34K -0.3% | -$22K -0.2% | -$126K | -$43K | -$15K |
| Net Income | $83.2M 78.2% | -$105.5M -446.9% | -$46.0M -167.7% | -$26.8M -263.5% | -$8.6M -29.9% | -$12.8M -96.0% | -$24.5M -191.0% | -$56.5M | -$43.4M | -$16.5M |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.40 | $-2.28 | $-1.30 | $-0.78 | $-2.11 | $-3.21 | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.35 | $-2.28 | — | — | $-2.11 | $-3.21 | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 55.3M | 46.3M | 35.5M | 34.5M | 29.8M | 4.0M | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 57.3M | 46.3M | — | — | 29.8M | 4.0M | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 52th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | — | 77.9 | — | 7.2 | 2.2 | 10.7 | — | — |
| R&D | — | 151.2 | 66.5 | 35.5 | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | — | 84.2 | 59.6 | 30.4 | 148.0 | 125.0 | 232.4 | 72.9 |
| Operating Income | — | -158.4 | -42.2 | 27.0 | -418.9 | -180.6 | -368.5 | -59.1 |
| Income Tax | — | -0.2 | -0.3 | 0.1 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 65.1 | 3.2 |
| Net Income | — | -191.0 | -96.0 | -29.9 | -263.5 | -167.7 | -446.9 | 78.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ZVRA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.