Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 186 of 5,944 reporting institutions (91th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $443.8M 100.0% | $362.5M 100.0% | $133.7M 100.0% | $135.9M 100.0% | $126.0M 100.0% | $113.6M 100.0% | $81.9M 100.0% | $53.1M 100.0% | $41.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $197.4M 44.5% | $168.0M 46.3% | $66.7M 49.8% | $70.9M 52.2% | $66.2M 52.6% | $54.6M 48.0% | $43.6M 53.2% | $27.3M 51.4% | $20.0M 48.9% |
| Gross Profit | $246.4M 55.5% | $194.5M 53.7% | $67.1M 50.2% | $65.0M 47.8% | $59.8M 47.4% | $59.0M 52.0% | $38.4M 46.8% | $25.8M 48.6% | $20.9M 51.1% |
| Research & Development | $18.4M 4.1% | $16.1M 4.4% | $8.4M 6.3% | $8.5M 6.2% | $11.4M 9.1% | $10.6M 9.3% | $8.5M 10.4% | $6.9M 12.9% | $4.5M 11.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $208.5M 47.0% | $204.4M 56.4% | $71.3M 53.3% | $63.5M 46.7% | $56.5M 44.9% | $51.9M 45.7% | $34.4M 42.1% | $24.7M 46.5% | $20.5M 50.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $226.8M 51.1% | $220.4M 60.8% | $79.6M 59.5% | $72.0M 52.9% | $67.9M 53.9% | $62.5M 55.0% | $48.1M 58.7% | $31.5M 59.4% | $25.0M 61.1% |
| Operating Income | $19.6M 4.4% | -$25.9M -7.1% | -$12.6M -9.4% | -$7.0M -5.1% | -$8.2M -6.5% | -$3.5M -3.0% | -$9.8M -11.9% | -$5.7M -10.8% | -$4.1M -10.0% |
| Interest Expense | $27.5M 6.2% | $20.3M 5.6% | $1.6M 1.2% | -$994K -0.7% | $2.8M 2.2% | $4.5M 3.9% | $1.4M 1.7% | $173K 0.3% | $342K 0.8% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $780K 0.2% | $926K 0.3% | $103K 0.1% | $71K 0.1% | $45K 0.0% | $55K 0.0% | $125K 0.2% | $262K 0.5% | $253K 0.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$4.1M -0.9% | -$1.2M -0.3% | -$29K -0.0% | $24K 0.0% | $8K 0.0% | -$102K -0.1% | -$50K -0.1% | -$165K -0.3% | -$1K -0.0% |
| Pretax Income | -$11.3M -2.5% | -$46.5M -12.8% | -$5.1M -3.8% | -$5.9M -4.3% | -$10.9M -8.6% | -$8.0M -7.0% | -$11.1M -13.5% | -$5.8M -11.0% | -$4.2M -10.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $8.7M 2.0% | $4.5M 1.2% | $589K 0.4% | $870K 0.6% | $1.9M 1.5% | $1.0M 0.9% | -$75K -0.1% | — | $311K 0.8% |
| Net Income | $20.6M 4.6% | $51.0M 14.1% | -$5.7M -4.2% | -$6.8M -5.0% | -$12.8M -10.1% | -$9.0M -7.9% | -$11.0M -13.4% | -$5.8M -11.0% | — |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.15 | $-0.43 | $-0.49 | $-0.49 | $-0.64 | $-0.46 | $-0.59 | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.15 | $-0.43 | $-0.49 | $-0.49 | $-0.64 | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 133.8M | 119.9M | 35.6M | 35.6M | 35K | 29.7M | 20.5M | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 133.8M | 119.9M | 35.6M | 35.6M | 35K | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $3.05 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 34.1%/yr for a decade (off $5M normalized FCF).
The market's 34.1% is more optimistic than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares · net debt $244M
mean -998.6% · volatility σ 1390% · implied rate exceeded in 0/3 yrs
Central path = implied 34.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (1390%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $9M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -3%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $36M covers the $0 due within a year 36496000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-03-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~9.8% on $280M of debt.
Cash of $36M is below short-term debt of $50M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 4th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 51.4 | 53.2 | 48.0 | 52.6 | 52.2 | 49.8 | 46.3 | 44.5 |
| Gross Profit | 48.6 | 46.8 | 52.0 | 47.4 | 47.8 | 50.2 | 53.7 | 55.5 |
| R&D | 12.9 | 10.4 | 9.3 | 9.1 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 4.4 | 4.1 |
| SG&A | 46.5 | 42.1 | 45.7 | 44.9 | 46.7 | 53.3 | 56.4 | 47.0 |
| Operating Income | -10.8 | -11.9 | -3.0 | -6.5 | -5.1 | -9.4 | -7.1 | 4.4 |
| Income Tax | — | -0.1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Net Income | -11.0 | -13.4 | -7.9 | -10.1 | -5.0 | -4.2 | 14.1 | 4.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on AIOT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.84T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.13T | 43.0× | 38.5× | 23.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.92T | 44.6× | 34.4× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.75T | 28.2× | 19.9× | 11.3× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.63T | 72.3× | 64.6× | 25.6× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 121.7× | 57.4× | 27.7× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $804.3B | 186.2× | 190.3× | 23.2× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $485.4B | — | 60.6× | 9.2× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $435.8B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $414.4B | 275.1× | 286.8× | 92.6× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $348.4B | 61.5× | 33.0× | 3.1× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $347.0B | 65.9× | 55.4× | 18.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $336.4B | 49.0× | 38.7× | 11.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $316.6B | — | — | 1023.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $275.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $268.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $254.3B | 281.2× | 218.9× | 51.7× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $249.8B | 233.7× | 156.0× | 27.1× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| CRM | $241.0B | 33.3× | 26.0× | 5.8× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| TXN | $239.4B | 48.3× | 31.5× | 13.5× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $236.0B | 68.3× | 59.6× | 26.2× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| IBM | $233.4B | 22.3× | — | 3.5× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $226.6B | — | — | 30.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $193.5B | 36.0× | 14.5× | 4.4× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $185.4B | 71.3× | 121.2× | 22.6× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| AIOT | $409M | — | 8.2× | 0.9× | 22.4% | 55.5% | -4.6% | -4.3% | -2.7% | 3.5× | 186 |
Peers = companies sharing AIOT's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.